In my previous reporting on U.S. v. Raniere, I exposed extensive proof of DOJ–MSM lawfare, with clear evidence to legally scrutinize Jack Smith, Merrick Garland, and Christopher Wray.
Read More:
What I am revealing now has not previously been reported.
In early 2022, core evidence of FBI and DOJ malfeasance was subjected to an independent grand jury exercise conducted by Raniere’s post-conviction legal team, including a retired FBI official, to test criminal exposure.
The central issue was FBI-DOJ involvement in the planting evidence, including digital files added to a hard drive and a camera’s memory card, as well as manipulation of timestamps to make nude (not depicting a sex act) photos of a single female subject (who did not testify) appear to have been taken in 2005. At the time, she would have been fifteen years old and a minor.
After reviewing the evidence and questioning the experts who testified at trial, 16 of 19 members of a randomly selected representative jury pool voted for a true bill, finding probable cause to indict two FBI agents. Even those who stated during deliberations that they held negative views of Raniere ultimately voted to indict, finding the evidence compelling.
In September 2022, when a former Manhattan Assistant District Attorney (ADA) and a retired FBI Unit Chief attempted to brief Alvin Bragg’s (NY County District Attorney’s) Office on this proof of FBI criminal conduct, which was squarely within Bragg’s jurisdiction, senior prosecutors initially agreed to meet, then abruptly canceled and refused to engage. Those same prosecutors, Susan Hoffinger and Christopher Conroy, later went on to prosecute and obtain a conviction against President Trump.
The NY County DA’s Office wouldn’t touch documented FBI crimes in the Raniere case, which implicated active agents. However, they had no problem manufacturing a case against President Trump.
What has emerged since the independent grand jury exercise is far more extensive and far more damning, and is proven by the government’s own records, including the secret alteration of core evidence while in FBI custody, which I previously reported on.
This is not conjecture. It is documented, highly vetted, and ongoing. The same implicated FBI and DOJ actors have appeared across numerous prosecutions over the past six years, placing those cases at risk and underscoring the urgency of identifying and rooting out those responsible. If they behaved illegally to target one defendant, they may have done the same in other cases, calling into question every case they’ve touched.
As detailed in my earlier reporting, this case has also been, and continues to be, systematically silenced by both the courts and the media. This is a coordinated effort to suppress information and a grave miscarriage of justice.
This information has been sent to the desk of FBI Director Kash Patel.
This presents a rare opportunity: a nonpartisan, pressure-tested case where accountability can be imposed based on documented facts, not politics. And it involves the same institutional actors who led the wrongful prosecution of President Trump.
If there is any serious intent to dismantle DOJ–FBI lawfare, along with their media enablers, rather than merely talk about it. This case can, and should, become a leading example.
I call on the FBI to reconsider the evidence and hold accountable those responsible. I will continue to engage with DOJ until justice is served and Americans can be confident in a fair and impartial result in this precedent-setting case.
