Vinay Prasad’s Trump Voodoo Doll Stabbing Raises Red Flags at FDA
Dr. Vinay Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist and FDA official, has infiltrated the FDA’s leadership, securing a pivotal role as Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) after being nominated for the role by HHS Secretary Robert F Kennedy, Jr. in May of 2025. Prasad has drawn scrutiny for his outspoken criticism of President Donald Trump, including a startling admission that he symbolically stabbed a Trump voodoo doll to “curse” Trump. For example, Prasad is known for his provocative commentary on podcasts and public platforms. Moreover, his vehement opposition to Trump and his supporters—whom he has likened to a “cult” and compared to “criminals”—has raised serious questions about potential bias in his role at the FDA. Specifically, his opposition to the Right to Try Act, a signature Trump policy aimed at aiding terminally ill patients, has come under increased scrutiny.
READ MORE HERE: Meet Vinay Prasad: The Progressive Leftist Saboteur Undermining President Trump’s FDA
Documented Anti-Trump Rhetoric
Prasad’s disdain for Trump is well-documented. In a February 2021 episode of his podcast Plenary Session, he referenced cursing Trump and stabbing a voodoo doll that resembled President Trump (2/7/21, 54:44). This symbolic act underscores the intensity of Prasad’s animosity toward Trump. In fact, he has expressed this hostility repeatedly across various public platforms. In October 2020, Prasad aligned himself with the Never Trump movement, stating, “I hate him too”(10/3/20, 1:47:44), and described Trump as a “narcissist” who “uses evil as a tool”(10/6/20, 1:52:10) . He further claimed Trump’s falsehoods could fill “a few 10,000-page volume books”(10/30/20, 13:48).
Prasad’s criticism also extends to Trump’s supporters, whom he has disparaged as a “cult” and likened to “substance abusers” or “criminals” (11/7/20, 1:00:21). Identifying as a self-described progressive “on the far left” (10/16/21, 35:37), Prasad expressed disappointment over the 2020 election’s close outcome. Notably, Prasad called it a “crushing loss for Democrats, for progressives like myself” (11/7/20, 2:18) because he wanted a wider margin of victory for Democrats. In a July 2022 episode of the VPZD Show, Prasad appeared to mock conservatives’ loyalty to Trump. Specifically, he referenced the January 6th events by criticizing Trump’s defenders as those who “turn a blind-eye for insurrection” (7/7/22, 1:08:30).
FDA Official Vinay Prasad’s Opposition to Trump’s Right to Try Act
Signed into law by President Trump in 2018, the “Right to Try Act” allows terminally ill patients to access experimental treatments not yet approved by the FDA, offering hope to those with limited options and a short life expectancy. However, Prasad’s public skepticism of Trump-associated policies, including his claim that Trump is “wrong about everything” (10/30/20, 13:48), has raised concerns about his approach to this landmark legislation. Consequently, Prasad’s progressive ideology and his personal animus toward Trump could influence his actions at the FDA. Notably, he could potentially undermine the policy’s intent to prioritize patient access over regulatory caution.
Attacks on Trump Supporters Signal Deeper Bias
Prasad’s outspoken rhetoric has cemented his status as a divisive figure at the FDA, with many wondering how such an anti-Trump individual secured a position in the Trump administration. While his progressive activism resonates with some, his inflammatory comments and symbolic acts of hatred toward President Trump, including his admission of stabbing a Trump voodoo doll, are unbecoming of an FDA official tasked with impartial decision-making. As the FDA navigates the implementation of Right to Try, Prasad’s role demands scrutiny. Moreover, can an official who has publicly expressed such hostility toward Trump and his supporters objectively steward a policy tied to the President’s legacy?
Shockingly, in an interview with Politico last week, which was mentioned in Politico Playbook, Politico’s Dasha Burns asked FDA Commissioner Marty Makary about Laura Loomer’s report on FDA official Vinay Prasad, who was exposed for his strong Anti-Trump beliefs. Makary responded by saying “there isn’t a political bone in his (Prasad’s) body” and that Prasad “is an impeccable scientist, I think one of the greatest scientific minds of our generation.”
Can a Trump Voodoo Doll Stabber Impartially Lead FDA Policy?
It should go without saying that stabbing voodoo dolls to initiate curses on your political enemies is not “impeccable science”, and it’s enough evidence to prove that there are in fact political bones inside of Prasad that influence his decisions. Moreover, Prasad’s outspoken rhetoric has cemented his status as a divisive figure at the FDA. Consequently, many are now questioning how such an openly anti-Trump individual managed to secure a position within the Trump administration.
The implications of Prasad’s tenure at the FDA are significant for patients relying on Right to Try as a lifeline for survival. As Prasad’s influence within the FDA continues to grow, his actions should remain under the microscope given the ramifications of his ability to shape the future of a health policy designed to offer hope to the terminally ill.
TDS should be classified as the mental illness it is
So, what has crawled up the butts of the indians that they, along with US demonrats, want to genocide all US whites/Christians/men?
We start by throwing light on the neglected subject regarding the shocking breach of medical ethics regarding safety protocols for the pre-testing of vaccines. It takes 5-10 years to complete Phase III trials to ensure that the human species isn’t wiped out should a general-use vaccine’s adverse effects prove deadly…
https://web.archive.org/web/20200501110007/https://www.ifpma.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/IFPMA-ComplexJourney-2019_FINAL.pdf
…thereby identifying the Satanist co-option of our institutions (who use the more numerous Marxists as pawns to implement their policies*) that knew the vaccines were deadly [if a blood vessel is pricked], otherwise no non-Satanist-Marxist entity would take a chance on the annihilation of humanity should the long-term adverse effects prove deadly. Oh yes, we’re currently in Year 5 of what should be Phase III.
Firstly, when pressed under oath in court, medical science is compelled to admit there is no such thing as a virus.* Secondly, medical science tells us there are no vaccines for cold viruses, the coronavirus, and RSV, being a cold virus.** Thirdly, if a blood vessel is pricked receiving a jab, where the needle wasn’t aspirated, that means, in the case of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, the nanoparticles carrying the mRNA have entered the bloodstream, and will now enter the cells of organs throughout the body,*** and being a foreign element within those cells, the immune system destroys the cells, leading to organ damage and/or subsequent death, the severity of the outcome depending on if the syringe carried a full mRNA load, or if its contents was merely saline.
This is why in 2017 the CDC and WHO alerted the medical community there was no longer a need to aspirate a needle, preventing the contents of the syringe from entering a blood vessel…
“Aspiration before injection of vaccines or toxoids (i.e., pulling back on the syringe plunger after needle insertion but before injection) is not necessary because no large blood vessels are present at the recommended injection sites, and a process that includes aspiration might be more painful for infants (22).”
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/administration.html
“…no large blood vessels”? The smallest blood vessels are measured in millionths of a meter (um), while nanoparticles that carry the mRNA are measured in billionths of a meter (nm). That’s called premeditated murder, identifying the Marxist co-option of our institutions.
Let’s take a look at WHO…
“Do NOT aspirate, i.e. do not pull back on the syringe after inserting in the injection site as it increases the pain:
− There are no large blood vessels at the recommended injection sites or injection into a large vessel, so no risk of major bleeding.”
https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/immunization/multiple-injections/trainingmodule_painmanagement_final.pdf?sfvrsn=1b91f223_7&ua=1
——————
* “I have to expressly clarify that one cannot provide evidence in the classical sense in biology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one can only gather clues, which at some point in time in their entirety attain probative value.“ — Professor Andreas Podbielski, University of Rostock, 2015, giving expert testimony on the existence of viruses at Ravensburg Local Court.
As Dr. Lanka observes:
“Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising from Podbielski’s lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrepancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fond of, something happened which behavioural scientists call “displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse, namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as well as vaccinations are per se unscientific and without evidence, without proof: In his opinion, only a collection of clues could “some day” and “somehow” (practically) attain probative value. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientific nature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity.”
https://dokumen.pub/wissenschafftplus-magazin-the-virus-misconception-part-1-measles-as-an-example-i-01-2020nbsped.html
Now, for the real shocker: How a virus is manufactured piecemeal, not captured whole…
“1. The fact of Alignment
Virologists have never isolated a complete
genetic strand of a virus and displayed it directly,
in its entire length. They always use very short
pieces of nucleic acids, whose sequence consists
of four molecules to determine them and call
them sequences. From a multitude of millions of
such specific, very short sequences, virologists
mentally assemble a fictitious long genome
strand with the help of complex computational
and statistical methods. This process is called
alignment.
The result of this complex alignment, the
fictitious and very long genetic strand, is
presented by virologists as the core of a virus
and they claim to have thus proven the
existence of a virus. However, such a complete
strand never appears in reality and in scientific
literature as a whole, although the simplest
standard techniques [Gel Electrophoresis]
have long been available to
determine the length and composition of nucleic
acids simply and directly. By the fact of the
alignment, instead of presenting a nucleic acid
of the appropriate length directly, the virologists
have disproved themselves.
…
3. Alignment is only done by means
of mental constructs
In order to be able to mentally/computationally
assemble the very short sequences of the
nucleic acids used into a long genome, the
virologists need a template to align the short
sequences into a very long, supposedly viral
genome strand. Without such a given, very long
sequence, it is not possible for a virologist to
construct a viral genome
theoretically/computationally. Virologists argue
that the constructed genome is from a virus
because the alignment was done with another,
given viral genome.
This argument of the virologists is briefly and
unambiguously refuted by the fact that all
templates with which new genetic material
strands were generated
theoretically/computationally were themselves
and finally generated
theoretically/computationally and do not
originate from a virus.” – Dr. Stefan Lanka
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-virologists.pdf
…and…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OGuWWI5aHE&t=8s
** “What’s Causing My Cold?
…
It’s likely that someday you’ll have a close encounter with one of these types:
Rhinovirus
Coronavirus
RSV and parainfluenza”
https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/common_cold_causes
What medical science says about vaccines for common cold viruses…
”Why Is There No Vaccine for the Common Cold?
………..
Research and Vaccine Development
Research on the development of a common cold vaccine suggests that a vaccine for the common cold is not likely in the near future.
A study that compiled past and present research on the development of a rhinovirus vaccine noted that:7
It will be difficult to develop the vaccine because rhinovirus infects quickly and mutates, or changes, quickly.
In clinical trials that tested a cold vaccine with just one strain, results showed that it was not protective.
In clinical trials that focused on a cold vaccine with 10 strains, results also found it to be ineffective.
If a cold vaccine does get developed, it will likely need to provide broad protection against many strains of rhinovirus.”
https://www.verywellhealth.com/why-there-will-never-be-a-vaccine-for-the-common-cold-770451
*** Instead of entering muscle cells in the deltoid region.
This Indian idiot had returned to CBER office.We need to alarm president Trump of these backstabbers!