In a stunning betrayal of President Donald Trump’s “Make America Healthy Again” vision, Dr. Vinay Prasad, a self-proclaimed progressive, has infiltrated the FDA’s leadership, securing a pivotal role as Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) after being nominated for the role by HHS Secretary Robert F Kennedy, Jr. in May of 2025. Far from being the reformist ally the Trump administration expected he may be, Prasad’s liberal ideology, outspoken anti-Trump rhetoric, and deliberate actions to obstruct the President’s deregulatory agenda make him a dangerous misfit in this critical position. His continued presence at the FDA threatens to derail the Trump administration’s mission to streamline regulations and prioritize American health. The appointment of Vinay Prasad represents a catastrophic vetting failure that demands immediate action to protect Trump’s transformative healthcare agenda.
A Lifelong Progressive Liberal with a Clear Anti-Trump Record
Vinay Prasad’s political alignment is unequivocally progressive, rooted in admiration for far-left figures like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. His public statements and voting history reveal a deep-seated opposition to Trump and his policies, making his appointment to a key FDA role baffling.

In 2021, Prasad described himself as a “political liberal, closest to Elizabeth Warren” and a “Sanders/Warren liberal,” proudly embracing a progressive identity. He voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic primary, and FEC records reveal he donated to Sanders’ campaign, signaling his support for radical left-wing policies.


In 2020, Prasad declared on X that he wanted “Biden to win more than anything” and confirmed he voted against Trump, solidifying his opposition to the President.

As recently as 2022 and 2023, Prasad reiterated his identity as a “lifelong progressive” and “Bernie fan,” leaving no doubt about his ideological leanings.

Prasad’s policy positions are a direct affront to the conservative principles underpinning Trump’s agenda. He advocates for universal basic income, student loan forgiveness, open borders, and Roe v. Wade abortion standards. He supports a 50% marginal tax rate for high earners, a wealth tax, single-payer healthcare, universally funded pre-K and community college, and expansive parental leave policies.

On racial issues, he has called for economic remedies for “profound injustice towards the Black Community” and passionately defends affirmative action, decrying its banning as a “poisonous idea.” These positions are not mere differences of opinion—they are fundamentally at odds with the Trump administration’s priorities of limited government, anti-DEI, pro-deregulation, and economic freedom.


Vinay Prasad’s Anti-Trump Rhetoric and Policy Positions
Prasad’s disdain for Trump is personal and vitriolic. He has called the President “perhaps the worst president in the history of the Republic.” Prasad has claimed that Trump disagreed with him “on probably 90% of issues.” He compared Trump’s family separation immigration policy to a “human rights violation” worthy of the International Criminal Court. Prasad mocked his election fraud claims as “laughable and pathetic,” and called January 6 “a terrible day.” Further, he even attacked Trump University as a “scam.” Prasad consistently refers to the President as “orange man.” This is a derogatory jab used by the radical Left to attack Trump over his tan skin. Prasad has a strong admiration for Dr. Anthony Fauci, whom he dubbed “St. Anthony of Fauci” with “profound reverence.” This further highlights his alignment with figures Trump has criticized, particularly over the COVID-19 response.

Sabotaging Trump’s Deregulatory Agenda
Since assuming control of CBER at the FDA, Prasad has amassed unprecedented power. He holds three key FDA roles: Chief Medical Officer, Chief Scientific Officer, and Director of CBER. Reports suggest he is under consideration to lead the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). This could make him more influential than FDA Commissioner Marty Makary. Moreover, this consolidation of authority in the hands of a Trump antagonist and avowed Leftist is a recipe for disaster. Prasad’s actions further demonstrate a clear intent to undermine President Trump’s vision.
Defying Administration Directives
At the beginning his second term, Trump issued a clear mandate to terminate remote work. Yet, Prasad emailed Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) staff allowing telework up to two days per week. His actions are in direct conflict with the administration’s return-to-office policy.
Stalling Deregulatory Reforms
Makary’s “plausible mechanism” pathway for rare diseases, a flagship initiative to accelerate drug approvals, has stalled under Prasad’s leadership. Analysts question whether his progressive views can align with Makary’s deregulatory approach, casting doubt on his commitment to Trump’s goals.
Missed Deadlines and Regulatory Gridlock Under Prasad
The FDA has missed multiple Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) deadlines under Prasad. Examples of these missed deadlines are GSK’s Nucala for COPD (May 7) and Stealth BioTherapeutics’ Barth syndrome treatment (April 29). More recently, Prasad has led arbitrary delays of gene and cell therapies from Ultragenyx and Capricor not based on science, but on his own left-wing agenda. These delays contradict Trump’s push for faster drug approvals, frustrating patients and industry alike.
A Regulatory Philosophy At Odds With Trump
Prasad’s regulatory philosophy is fundamentally anti-Trump. While the President has criticized the FDA’s “slow and burdensome” approval process, he has argued for tougher reviews. Also, Prasad dismissed Republican pressure to streamline approvals as misguided. He criticized Trump’s Right-To-Try policies, calling the President “incorrect” and blaming pharmaceutical companies, not the FDA, for delays in drug access. By publishing major policy changes in academic journals rather than through transparent public comment portals, Prasad has reduced opportunities for input from patients, providers, and industry, further eroding trust in the FDA.
A Catastrophic Vetting Failure
Prasad’s appointment is a glaring intelligence and vetting failure. His nearly $4 million in funding from the left-leaning Arnold Foundation, residence in progressive strongholds like San Francisco and Oregon, and a history of making anti-Trump statements and support for the radical Left should have raised red flags. These issues, combined with his unabashed progressive activism, signal a profound misalignment with the Trump administration’s values. How someone with such a clear anti-Trump record was entrusted with a critical regulatory role at the FDA is a question that demands answers.
The Urgent Need for Prasad’s Removal From The FDA
Vinay Prasad’s presence in the FDA is a betrayal of the voters who elected Trump to dismantle bureaucratic overreach and prioritize American health. His progressive ideology, personal attacks on the President, and actions—purging leadership, missing deadlines, defying directives, and overriding experts—prove he is not a reformist ally, but is unseated a saboteur. The Trump administration must act swiftly to remove him before he inflicts further damage on the “Make America Healthy Again” agenda. Allowing a trojan horse wield such power is a mistake that threatens the very reforms Trump was elected to deliver. The time to act is now—Prasad must go before he completely destroys the MAHA movement and all of the hard work President Trump has put into his regulatory reform agenda.





Vinay Prasad clearly needs to be removed based upon these incredible and stunning findings by Laura.
Please also investigate San Francisco resident David Sacks. He and his wife are huge supporters of communist Trump-hating Congressman Ro Khanna (D-India), and he also donated to Crooked Hillary, RINO Mitt Romney, Kyrsten Sinema, and even Never Trumper 2016 Candidate Carly Fiorina.
HOW is this smelly “sect” of brahmans (like nimrata “nikki” haley) becoming the overlords of WHITE Christian America???? HOW????
I KNOW ALL ABOUT kamalatoe’s mom there in Canada!!!
WHERE is MY military?????
Oh how the not-mighty-at-all have fallen further! Because of your inferiority as a white christian cult member, the chaste, pure Brahmans have become the overlords of the inferior white christian cult. The Brahmans invented the decimal without which you white pagans would still be living in caves. The Brahmans have taken over medicine, technology, law and now politics to ensure your subservience.
You are welcome!
Prasad is trying to kill Capricor much needed therapy for children with duchenne. I guarantee if it was targeting indian children, it would have been approved already. He viscerally hates white people and i believe he will see him destroying many other small bio companies to please his handlers.
He deserves 100 years in prison and his entire family stripped of US citizenship and shipped back to indian, where he can then hate white children without harm.
Haha, stupid MAGA cucks.
Genuine question for Laura;
Who sponsored this article?
Was it Lifewater Media or some other targeted social media marketing firm? Perhaps it was requested by Pfizer/Moderna/etc. directly. I know you would not invest your time in writing a hit piece on this man whom is blocking these genetic modifying poisons for children. The hubris required to act as if man made, commercial medical products could improve on the perfect design of the human immune system created by God is terrifying. I will certainly pray for your soul and the ones of these other commenters who clearly have no clue and were likely asleep during the last 5 years.
Agreed. Prasad is a liberal who saw that the Left was wrong about the science regarding covid and other issues. He could work w/ Kennedy. As a conservative, I’m disappointed that he was driven out based on this one sided hit piece, probably pharma driven as you suggested.
Totally agreed!XBI(SPDR) in 2025 -3.66%,while the similar index of HongKong is about +80%.
This Indian is a pure saboteur!
Thank you Laura!The Indian saboteur departs FDA!
If you had done a real deep dive into Vinay Prasad- without an agenda – you would understand (and appreciate) how outspoken he was about covid regulations and the bureaucracy in the Biden administration with all the top FDA officials at the time. His decision making was – and is- rooted in the data we should all require from BIG Pharma. VP did not have to agree with everything Trump did or didn’t do in order to do his job well. Many people who wanted a change in our Government didn’t necessarily “love trump” but they wanted a change from what we had with Biden. Did you take the time to listen to any of his Podcasts or any of the new FDA YouTube discussions he co-created in order to promote full transparency to the public? We have NEVER had that level of transparency. I understand you taking the time to dig through Twittter – but you fell short in telling the entire story. Vinay Prasad was a voice of reason when the entire world was losing its mind during the covid lockdowns, and he is NOT a Politically motivated individual the way your portrayed by taking bits and pieces from his twitter feed….. But you would have had to do a deeper dive into your journalism to catch that. This is a very unfortunate loss for the Trump team and the FDA – even if you fail to see why.
What an epic mistake to vilify and “cancel” Prasad. Deliberately refusing to understand someone because of some perceived political affiliation is not only a hallmark of Bonhoeffer’s stupidity, it’s probably the worst characteristic of the radical left. I’m a right leaning scientist, and I’ve watched Prasad’s youtube videos, and I’ve read his two books. He is the right man for the job! He’s extremely intelligent, has oodles of integrity, and the guy has a tremendous amount of good-will. Who cares if he’s said some left wing stuff in some context. Maybe having someone like Prasad would have built a bridge to get through to brain washed leftists on the other side of the political spectrum.
1000000% agree. Those who don’t take the time to listen to what he has to say are so misinformed. Loomer got this soooooo wrong.
This reads like a bizarre parody of the progressive left. What scientific qualifications does Laura Loomer have to evaluate the regulatory decisions of Dr. Vinay Prasad, a respected physician and researcher? Her entire argument hinges on old tweets and a rigid loyalty test , the same cancel culture tactics she claims to oppose.
Even stranger, she suddenly trusts Big Pharma’s word as absolute truth? When has Loomer ever defended pharmaceutical companies, yet now she’s taking Sarepta’s side without question? Makes you wonder who’s funding this outrage.
Prasad is far more qualified to weigh in on complex gene therapies and vaccine policy than Loomer will ever be. He’s also expressed support for Trump and the broader MAGA movement, which this hit piece completely ignores.
As someone who voted for Trump twice, this article is disappointing. It mimics the exact ideological purity games of the far left. If conservatives start playing that same game, we’re no better
totally agree. Science is truth and not speculation no matter which political side you are on
Vinay was a great addition to this administration. No one in healthcare gives a damn if he is progressive or liberal or maga. WE just cared about his overwhelming experience and expertise on the subject matter. You claim you supported evidence based medicine, Dr. Prasad was the face of that. The outing of a great and qualified physician based on politics is dirty and the American people are worse off because of it.
Who paid you for this article? This is some dark shit that most Americans won’t ever pick up on. This guy has the most impressive critical appraisal skills of just about anyone in the medical community. I have followed him for years purely from a medical standpoint. The majority of the tweets listed are examples of him calling out people on the left! The swell of propaganda against him must have started from the drug company and whoever else in government has financial ties to Sarepta.
I was sorry to see him appointed and glad he’s gone. We need a leader who can help get more drugs thru the pipeline, especially for rare diseases. That means helping companies that live by a financial thread get thru trials with promising drugs. This requires expertise that understands that if all you look at is overall survival, most patients will have died before you approve a drug. Meaningful extension of a better life till the next improvement comes does lead to improved over all survival. He was just too young and arrogant to have that type of maturity.
Of course, it does make me question the wisdom of those who hired him.