Loomer Unleashed has exclusively obtained and reviewed a June 23 Refuse Fascism Zoom call in which their leaders openly admitted to being revolutionary communists and unveiled their plans for July 1–4 protests in Washington, D.C.—culminating in a July 4 spectacle outside the White House.
EXCLUSIVE: Refuse Fascism Caught on Zoom Plotting July 4 “Uprising” While Denying Communist Ties
Refuse Fascism was founded in 2016 in the wake of President Donald J. Trump’s historic victory over Hillary Clinton, who the group despised as a symbol of establishment power. While the group has long marketed itself as an “anti-fascist” coalition, its roots trace directly back to the radical Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP). On the recent Zoom call exclusively obtained by Loomer Unleashed, Refuse Fascism co-founder Sunsara Taylor inadvertently confirmed the group’s true ideological nature.
“Yes, I am a communist… and I am a revolutionary,” Taylor admitted during a Q&A segment, after being confronted with a question about whether her communist affiliations meant she was anti-democracy.
Inside Refuse Fascism’s July 1–4 Playbook: Leaked Agenda Reveals Plan to Disrupt D.C. on Independence Day
Toward the end of the call, Refuse Fascism leaders Sunsara Taylor and Sam Goldman revealed their four-day tactical schedule aimed at disrupting Washington, D.C., and hijacking the national celebration of Independence Day. The internal agenda outlines:
The visual agenda (see below) confirms:
6PM on July 1 – “Trump Must Go NOW!” block party and fundraiser at Logan Circle
6:30 PM on July 2 – “Teach-in” titled What Will It Take To Defeat Trump/MAGA Fascism?
11AM on July 3 – “Speak Out” outside the National Museum of African American History
2PM on July 4 – March from Logan Circle to the White House
The organizers also promised pop-up protests, rush hour banner drops, and mobilization at transit hubs, branding the July 4 finale as “The BIGGEST CHANT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD.”
Communist Recruitment Under the Banner of Anti-Fascism
During the call, Taylor and Goldman repeatedly pushed attendees to support their “4 Days in D.C.” action. While soliciting donations, they portrayed the protests as a patriotic stand against fascism. Yet when questioned, Taylor doubled down on her radical views.
“I have never identified as a member of the Revolutionary Communist Party… but I am an active revcom,” she stated, referring to herself as a follower of RCP leader Bob Avakian.
Despite denying formal party membership, Taylor defended the RCP’s “Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America,” which is a blueprint to replace the United States with a centrally planned communist state. She claimed this communist regime would guarantee “more rights” than the existing constitutional system, which she derided as a “capitalist, imperialist dictatorship.”
So much for “refusing fascism.” What this group wants is to replace American democracy with a communist regime.
Taylor’s Word Salad on “Democracy”
Taylor tried to justify her ideology with academic doublespeak. However, it came out as a blatant veiled rejection of American democratic values:
“There’s no such thing as a pure democracy… You get to vote over who is on top of that system, but the system itself is not up for a vote… We don’t live in a democratic society. We live in a capitalist, imperialist dictatorship.”
She continued,“… but the nature of that system is not up for a vote. That’s not a democracy for the people—it’s a democracy for the system.”
This line of argument is straight from the Marxist playbook: discredit the system, sow instability, and present communist revolution as the only path forward. While insisting her views should not disqualify her from leading Refuse Fascism, Taylor made it clear that Democracy, as it is understood by the average American, is not her goal.
From Anti-Trump to Anti-American
Refuse Fascism’s July 4th mobilization is not simply about opposing Trump. Instead, it’s about delegitimizing the American system of government, law enforcement, and capitalism itself. The group’s rhetoric has increasingly shifted from criticizing Trump to targeting Israel, policing, opposing immigration enforcement, and attacking the Western world as a whole.
In previous reports, Loomer Unleashed has documented:
Pro-Hamas Extremist Partnerships: Refuse Fascism co-led the June 14 Anti-Trump Protests alongside pro-Hamas extremists, normalizing fringe support for candidates like Zohran Mamdani.
Soros-Linked Coordination: Dark money groups have been revealed funding the street-level operations of radical communist organizers.
’86 47′ Assassination Chants: Open calls for President Trump’s assassination have become normalized protest slogans at Refuse Fascism and were even captured by Loomer Unleashed in more establishment groups like Indivisible/50501’s “No Kings” protest.
Democrats Still Embracing the Extremism
While Refuse Fascism tries to paint itself as a “broad tent,” Taylor made it clear she doesn’t even support the Democrat Party.
Despite Taylor’s rejection of both political parties and her attacks on the Democrat Party’s foreign policy in Gaza and Iraq, elected Democrats continue to lend legitimacy to Refuse Fascism. New York Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist, has repeatedly appeared at their events. On October 27, 2024, Mamdani attended a Resist Fascism rally in Bryant Park alongside signs supporting Hamas and rally goers who were calling for a revolution.
The continued crossover between radical groups and Democrat-affiliated politicians reveals a dangerous trend: the normalization of communism under the guise of progressive activism.
This isn’t just about Trump anymore. It’s about a radical, coordinated effort to hijack our political system, erase American sovereignty, and install a communist regime under the guise of “anti-fascism.”
“This Is Bigger”: Sunsara’s Call for Unity But Only Under Communist Terms
In her closing remarks, Taylor warned attendees to prepare for “anti-communist attacks” and called on activists to overcome infighting for the sake of the movement.
“We need to learn how to stand together and work together across our differences,” she said—before immediately redefining “unity” as adherence to her ideology.
Sam Goldman followed Taylor by encouraging attendees on the Zoom call to share Refuse Fascism’s organizing principles with their networks and to sign on as individuals or groups. The intent was clear: grow the movement by embedding its doctrine into existing institutions.
Refuse Fascism wants to present itself as a broad-based anti-fascist movement, yet the ideology they’re promoting is explicitly anti-democratic, communist, and revolutionary.
Independence Day or Insurrection?
As Americans prepared to celebrate July 4th, groups like Refuse Fascism organized to hijack Independence Day to push a revolutionary, anti-American agenda. Their own words and plans reveal a radical, coordinated effort to replace American democracy with communist authoritarianism.
Refuse Fascism claims to stand against fascism, but what they’re selling is far more dangerous: a revolution that would destroy the very freedoms Independence Day represents. Loomer Unleashed will continue documenting Refuse Fascism’s anti-Trump and anti-American activity and their push for a communist revolution in the United States.
It blows my mind.
Fascists are Marxists, what is known as the “false opposition”, and both Marxists and their cut-out Fascist comrades have but one “general line” policy, that being the “abolition of religion” and the destruction of those civilizations “whose spiritual aroma is religion”.* Hitler & Company’s assignment was concentrated on European Jewry:
As soon as the World War I operation had ended, Marxists began planning for the World War II operation with the creation of that war’s two false opposition fronts, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party and the National Fascist Party in Italy. Benito Mussolini was a well known and influential Marxist before the Comintern ordered that he take up a new identity as leader of the National Fascist Party; Italian fascists held positions in the Comintern.
As for Adolf Hitler’s Marxist pedigree, one-third of Hitler’s SA and Gestapo personnel were ‘former’ Marxists whom Hitler ordered were to be immediately accepted into the ranks of the SS without any vetting:
“Adolf Hitler himself was the first to admit that National Socialism and Communism had much in common. ‘There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it,’ he once said in a revealing conversation, ‘There is, above all, revolutionary feeling…I have always made allowances for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social Democrat and the trade-union boss will never be a National Socialist, but the Communist always will.’ Hitler, in this case at least, was true to his word. After he seized power, he saw to it that thousands of Communists were enrolled in the NSDAP. They were particularly effective in the Gestapo and in the SA, where they formed perhaps a third of the total membership. Indeed, there were so many of them that they were given a special name. They were known popularly as the “Beefsteak Nazi” – Brown on the outside, Red on the inside.” — Robert G. L. Waite, Vanguard of Nazism: The Free Corps Movement in Postwar Germany 1918-1923
During the course of World War II Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, Chief of the Abwehr (German military intelligence), and General Reinhard Gehlen, Chief of the German General Staff’s intelligence unit for the Soviet Union and East European countries, Foreign Armies East (FHO), independently discovered that a group supervised by Deputy Führer Martin Bormann, second in command of Germany, was transmitting unsupervised coded radio messages to Moscow:
“Our suspicions were largely confirmed when, independently of one another, we found out that Bormann and his group were operating an unsupervised radio transmitter network and using it to send coded messages to Moscow. When OKW monitors reported this, Canaris demanded an investigation; but word came back that Hitler himself had emphatically forbidden any intervention: he had been informed in advance by Bormann of these Funkspiele, or fake radio messages, he said, and he had approved them.” — Reinhard Gehlen, The Service: The Memoires of General Reinhard Gehlen
…and after the war…
“It was not until after 1946, when I headed my own intelligence organization, that I had an opportunity to look into Bormann’s mysterious escape form Hitler’s Berlin bunker and his subsequent disappearance. Some time later I received conclusive proof of Bormann’s postwar movements. During the 1950s I was passed two separate reports from behind the Iron Curtain to the effect that Bormann had been a Soviet agent and had lived after the war in the Soviet Union under the cover as an advisor to the Moscow government, and has died in the meantime.” — General Reinhard Gehlen, “The Service: The Memoirs of General Reinhard Gehlen”, p. 71 (1972).
=================
* “As part of the program to destroy religion from within, the KGB, in the late 1950s, started sending dedicated young Communists to ecclesiastical academies and seminaries to train them as future church leaders. These young Communists joined the Church… at the call of the Communist Party… to implement its general line in the struggle against religion.
In the present phase, secret agents in the Catholic and other churches are being used to implement Communist strategy . When they achieve their Communist world victory, they will use mass withdrawal of their agents to disrupt and destroy the churches. ” – KGB defector Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, ‘The Perestrpika Deception, pp. 116-117, 1995.
https://ia800305.us.archive.org/27/items/AnatoliyGolitsyn/Golitsyn-ThePerestroikaDeception-TheWorldsSlideTowardsTheSecondOctoberRevolution1995.pdf
While Major Golitsyn’s reference to the “general line” is broader in scope than merely wiping out religion on the planet, in fact wiping out religion was the sole purpose of Marx’s adult life, known to only a relatively few within the Movement:
The essence of communism is to advance “The Struggle”, “The Struggle” entailing Karl Marx’s 1843 directive to implement the “abolition of religion”, and the destruction of those civilizations “whose spiritual aroma is religion” [see ADDENDUM]. Soon after transferring university from Bonn to Berlin, the young Karl Marx, up until then a warm-hearted Lutheran, ended up waging a war against God, because he accepted as true the Lutheran belief that his libertine behavior in Berlin consigned him to Hell. So Marx concocted a materialist philosophy based on a tautological foundation to wage war against God and humanity, as the following poems identify:
“Thus Heaven I’ve forfeited, I know it full well, My soul, once true to God, Is chosen for hell.”
…and…
“With disdain I will throw my gauntlet Full in the face of the world, And see the collapse of this pygmy giant Whose fall will not stifle my ardour. Then will I wander godlike and victorious Through the ruins of the world And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator.”
Marx’s Foundational Tautology
Marx writes (Chapter 24, first paragraph, Capital, 1867), “Hitherto we have investigated how surplus-value emanates from capital; we have now to see how capital arises from surplus-value.” See the tautology? Surplus value and capital are the same thing [see ADDENDUM II]! How did this tautology get past the initial reviews? How did this tautology survive the intervening 158 years without being discovered, except for this political scientist? This again illustrates the magnitude of the Marxist co-option of our institutions.
In Capital, Marx begins his analysis with an already existing capitalist economy. Marx can’t explain how the capitalist economy came into existence because such an economy couldn’t come into existence according to Marx’s peculiar analysis of the capitalist economy where surplus-value created capital must first exist, but since surplus-value doesn’t exist yet, there can be no capital to begin the capitalist economy. To overcome this inherent contradiction in Marx’s “investigation”, he begins Capital where we find an already existing capitalist economy:
“The wealth of those societies in which the capitalist mode of production prevails, presents itself as “an immense accumulation of commodities,” its unit being a single commodity. Our investigation must therefore begin with the analysis of a commodity.”
ADDENDUM
Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Karl Marx (1843)
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
…and…
“The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.”
…and…
“It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world.”
Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, “The Struggle”…
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
ADDENDUM II
Marx recognizes the tautology (using diversion to hide the tautology by calling it a “vicious circle”), and, as usual with other self-imploding observations, erects a non-defense defense:
“Chapter Twenty-Six: The Secret of Primitive Accumulation We have seen how money is changed into capital; how through capital surplus-value is made, and from surplus-value more capital. But the accumulation of capital presupposes surplus-value; surplus-value presupposes capitalistic production; capitalistic production presupposes the pre-existence of considerable masses of capital and of labour power in the hands of producers of commodities. The whole movement, therefore, seems to turn in a vicious circle, out of which we can only get by supposing a primitive accumulation (previous accumulation of Adam Smith) preceding capitalistic accumulation; an accumulation not the result of the capitalistic mode of production, but its starting point.”
Marx’s solution to his tautology is to tell us that the Capitalist mode of production commenced by “supposing”! Marx magically creates a primitive accumulation of capital base upon which the capitalist mode of production flowered from, but this “supposing” primitive accumulation of capital doesn’t solve the tautology, it merely pushes the tautology further back in time. According to Marx, In order to have capital one needs surplus value (“capital arises from surplus value”), but surplus value can’t exist without first capital existing (“surplus value emanates from capital”)! Pushing back a tautology to an earlier time period doesn’t solve the tautology. Nothing can.
The history that wasn’t directed to your attention during school days that explains events currently taking place throughout the West:
(1) The World War I Allies conspire to not mine the Danish Straits, such mining allowing the Allies to control the Baltic Sea, which means the British and Russian navies can hook up, allowing troop landings all across the Baltic coastlines, resulting in Germany being knocked out of the war before the war begins; the mining of the Danish Straits checkmates Germany. However, Germany is allowed to mine the Danish Straits, knowing their critical importance to her entry into the looming war. Germany also bullies Denmark into placing mines in the straits. Once Germany moves on the straits, Britain and Russia conspire to not use their minesweepers to remove the mines!
Why isn’t this in our history books?
Why didn’t the press of the day sound the alarm about the critical importance of controlling the Danish Straits?
Where were the calls for inquiries into the Danish Straits fiasco that allowed World War I to take place?
(2) The World War I Allies conspired to not deploy the 50,000 strong Czech Legion to oust Lenin & Bolsheviks in Saint Petersburg. The Check Legion was encamped southeast of Kiev, 600 miles south of Saint Petersburg, but instead of sending the legion 600 miles north to destroy Lenin & Bolsheviks, the Allies send the legion 6,000 miles across Russia to Vladivostok for evacuation, thereby allowing the redeployment of one-million German soldiers from the Russian Eastern Front to the Western Front!
Why would the Allies want Russia out of the war, knowing they would now probably lose the war with the arrival on the Western Front of one-million German soldiers?
Who told the Bolshevik Central Committee that it was safe to go ahead with the Kerensky coup, allaying their fears that the Allies had no intention of easily destroying the Bolsheviks?
Why didn’t the press call for inquiries into the Czech Legion fiasco?
(3) The Indian Army’s first engagement in Europe easily penetrated German lines, thereby further identifying the Marxist co-option of the West’s institutions…
“The Indian Corps attacked it [village of Neuve Chapelle] on 10 March [1915]. It was the first recital of a story which was to become familiar: an artillery preparation, puny by later standards, which neither cut the wire properly nor destroyed the machine-guns; the enemy front line overrun, but the second wave of the attack inexplicably delayed for hours; then well-organized counter-attacks… His 2/3rd Gurkhas carried the village and first-line trenches, took three hundred prisoners and dug in. But the Garhwalis lost direction, inclined too much to the right, and came up against a belt of wire in which they tore gaps with bare hands. Eventually, having lost all their British Officers, they took about two hundred yards of enemy trench, but were separated from the rest of the brigade. It was the first time on the Western Front that the German line was broken. But the follow-up was a problem never solved. It was largely a matter of communications: telephone cable wire cut, runners shot and carrier pigeons unreliable. The Garhwali Brigade was in Neuve Chapelle by 9.30 a.m., but the Dehra Dun Brigade in support did not come forward until 4.00 p.m., and by that time the impetus of the attack was lost. They crossed the Des Layes stream, but had barely made contact with the enemy when they were withdrawn behind it.” — “The Indian Army and the King’s Enemies, 1900-1947”, by Charles Chenevix Trench (Thames and Hudson: New York, New York, 1988), p. 41.
Unreliable pigeons? How does a homing pigeon become unreliable? Pigeons were reliable for the Americans when they came late into the war. Cut telephone cable? How did Germans get behind the Allied unit to cut the cable? Runners shot? By whom? Germans behind the Allied unit? How did they get there? And why would a support unit wait for even thirty minutes to advance once the initial unit has disappeared from view? Obviously the initial unit would be known to be holding its ground and in need of assistance, since otherwise a rout would have long earlier had sepoy or German combatants returning back to their respective trenches. But this comedic spectacle of Allied imbecility isn’t a mere one-case occurrence at Neuve Chapelle. As Major Trench observes, the Allies refused to learn from their gross errors for the duration of the war, proving that the purpose for the war was to weaken Western Civilization.
(4) The operational commander for the 1916 Dublin ‘insurrection’, and the originator for the plan of general insurrection against the Union, was the Marxist intellectual James Connolly, who couldn’t let slip his true philosophical passion about Ireland and its institutions when he admitted years before the ‘insurrection’, “Ireland without her people is nothing to me…”* That means the nation of Ireland, the Irish nationality, the Irish nationality meaning the people of the island who identify as Irish, along with her religious based institutions, are abhorrent, as are nations to all Marxists; Marxists believe in a one-world Soviet totalitarian land mass devoid of religion.
“At the heart of the 1916 rising was a Marxist revolutionary socialist, James Connolly. This inconvenient truth was largely hidden from the Irish population for many decades. Nationalist Ireland preferred to portray Connolly as a Vincent de Paul-type figure who was “concerned” about poverty.”
https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/heritage/james-connolly-s-vision-never-realised-1.2556902
The long-term objective of these Marxists is to follow Marx’s orders to his disciples to implement the “abolition of religion” and destruction of those civilizations whose “spiritual aroma is religion”…
“Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right“, Karl Marx (1843)**
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
…and…
“The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.”
…and…
“It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world.”
Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, “The Struggle”…
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
Notice when the ‘insurrection’ took place…Easter Monday, a shot into the bow of religion in Ireland, as would make Marx proud of the profanation’s symbolism.
Of course, as is the case when Marxists take over a nation’s establishment, and as was seen in the USSR and China, the less hardcore Marxists are liquidated, as took place in Ireland under the misnomer-named Irish Civil War, where over one-thousand lost their lives.
———————————————
* https://www.marxists.org/archive/connolly/1900/07/comingen.htm
** https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/
Reply