Newly leaked images, video clips and transcripts from a June 23 Zoom call obtained exclusively by Loomer Unleashed reveal the full scope of Refuse Fascism’s July 1-4 anti-Trump campaign, along with explosive internal contradictions over the group’s ties to revolutionary communism.
Refuse Fascism describes itself as a coalition of “people coming from diverse perspectives united in a singular mission of getting millions and millions into the streets raising the demand that Trump must go now and not stopping until this regime is removed from power.”
But, behind the slogans is a web of deception, radicalism, and anti-democratic ideology. The Refuse Fascism June 23 Zoom call felt more like an indoctrination campaign to recruit people into their revolutionary ideology versus a group expressing their true concerns regarding President Trump’s policies and his administration’s agenda.
“If you are a member of the press or any policy authority, you are not invited to this Zoom.”
— Sunsara Taylor, Refuse Fascism Co-founder
Refuse Fascism: Communist Roots, Denial, and Deception
In the June 23 meeting, Refuse Fascism co-founder Sunsara Taylor addressed accusations of being anti-democracy due to her ties to the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP). She strongly denied being a “member” of the RCP, claiming the accusation was a “misidentification.”
“I have never identified as a member of the Revolutionary Communist Party,” Taylor said.
However, she then stated clearly:
“I am an active revcom… a revolutionary communist and a follower of the revolutionary leader, Bob Avakian.”
Taylor even mentioned that she is a follower of Bob “Baba” Avakian, she said she has written a new constitution for America, and that she is fighting for the revolution that he re-envisioned.
Notably, Baba’s new constitution is titled, the New Socialist Republic in North America.”
Refuse Fascism engages in this kind of gaslighting when they deny ties to the RCP while openly promoting its doctrine, leaders, and communist revolutionary strategy.
The Facts: RCP Created Refuse Fascism
Despite Taylor’s public distancing, the Revolutionary Communist Party itself released a 2017 statement taking credit for Refuse Fascism’s formation:
“The Revolutionary Communist Party took the initiative to form Refuse Fascism”
— RCP Statement, July 2017
In that statement, RCP argued that capitalism is inseparable from fascism, and that the election of Donald Trump would lead to a regime that would “bludgeon and eliminate whole groups of people.”
So what’s the difference between Refuse Fascism and the RCP? Functionally, there is none. One is the face; the other is the fist… the hammer and the sickle. Refuse Fascism was created as a tool to broaden the net for grabbing unsuspecting liberals into RCP’s mission or strategy for revolution.
July 4 Plotting: “Declare Independence from Trump”
Refuse Fascism co-founder Sunsara Taylor made it known that Refuse Fascism is calling for a convergence on the 4th of July in D.C., stating that the Zoom attendees need to raise the demand that “Trump must go now” and “2028 is just too late.”
Throughout the June 23 leaked Zoom call, Refuse Fascism leaders meticulously laid out their operational plan for a four-day disruption campaign in Washington, D.C. leading up to and culminating on Independence Day.
Kicking off on July 1 with a block party and fundraiser at Logan Circle, the organizers aim to attract foot traffic and donations while priming the crowd for the more radical actions that follow.
On July 2, they’ve scheduled a “Teach-In” meant to train activists on how to defeat what they call “Trump/MAGA fascism.”
July 3 shifts the campaign into overt public agitation with a “Speak-Out” event planned outside the National Museum of African American History.
On July 4, Refuse Fascism planned to march to the White House and stage what they hoped would be the “BIGGEST CHANT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD: TRUMP MUST GO NOW!”
From Protest to Revolution: Inside Refuse Fascism’s July 4 Indoctrination Strategy
In several key moments of the footage exclusively obtained by Loomer Unleashed, Refuse Fascism leaders outlined the ideological drive behind their July 4 mobilization. They repeatedly framed their opposition to President Trump not just as political, but as moral and existential. They also demanded a complete removal of what they call a ‘fascist regime.’ The rhetoric surrounding this operation was militant and absolutist during the Zoom call. Sam Goldman and Sunara Taylor then shared screen slides with slogans like “TRUMP MUST GO NOW!” and “In the name of humanity, we refuse to accept a fascist America.”
Sunsara Taylor and Sam Goldman repeatedly emphasized that their campaign was not interested in “half-measures”, but in upending the entire system they believe enables Trumpism. During one segment of the Zoom call, Sunsara Taylor warned that “nothing short of mass sustained nonviolent protest will stop Trump,” reiterating the need to bring “millions into the streets.” Yet, the refusal to disavow a question about political violence, shut down by Sam Goldman without comment, left serious questions about their real boundaries.
Cult Messaging and the Push to “Remake Society”
In another revealing moment during the Zoom call, the group pivoted from protest logistics to indoctrination, encouraging participants to embrace a “revolutionary morality.” This is a clear indicator that this is not simply a resistance, but a call for a cultural and ideological revolution. The call, at times, felt less like a strategy session and more like a cult recruitment meeting.
Sunsara Taylor reinforced this shift by stating, “the hour is late, and the stakes are enormous,” emphasizing that history will judge those who fail to act. They closed by soliciting donations and reminding everyone: “This isn’t just a protest, it’s a movement to remake society.” What was not emphasized in their materials was any call for peaceful coexistence with those they disagree with politically. The message was clear: escalate, disrupt, remove.
Radical Messaging Hidden Behind Unity Slogans
Taylor and others also tried to shield their rhetoric behind broad unity messaging:
“We don’t have to agree on everything… we do agree on something that’s bigger: the future I want, and the future you want, even if it’s different.”
But, this was quickly undercut by repeated warnings that participants should prepare for “anti-communist attacks” and avoid slander, smears, and accusations—the very tactics the far left regularly hurls at its opponents.
The Endgame is Revolution, Not Resistance
This Zoom call confirms what many have long suspected: Refuse Fascism is not a grassroots protest movement, but the militant street-level arm of a much larger revolutionary communist effort to destabilize America from within. Sunsara Taylor’s attempted distancing from the Revolutionary Communist Party is not only disingenuous—it is part of a larger, coordinated deception strategy.
These groups, often operating in tandem with or quietly supported by factions within the Democrat Party, are creating ideological cover for radicals like New York Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani—a self-described Democratic Socialist who openly aligns with anti-Israel, pro-Hamas, and revolutionary organizations. Mamdani is now the Democrat nominee for Mayor of NYC. What we’re witnessing is not just fringe activism. Instead, it’s the slow, methodical infiltration of communist ideology into mainstream American politics, weaponized through protests, NGOs, and activist coalitions.
Refuse Fascism’s true goal isn’t to resist fascism. It’s to dismantle the American system altogether. They want to dismantle our borders, our Constitution, our electoral process and replace it with a collectivist regime rooted in revolutionary Marxism. Their leaders don’t hide this agenda. They declare it openly when they think the cameras are off.
Loomer Unleashed will continue exposing the communist infection festering inside our political system. We will not take them at their word. We will show their words to the world.
Fascists are Communists/Marxists, what is known as the “false opposition”, and both Marxists and their cut-out Fascist comrades have but one “general line” policy, that being the “abolition of religion” and the destruction of those civilizations “whose spiritual aroma is religion”.* Hitler & Company’s assignment was concentrated on European Jewry:
As soon as the World War I operation had ended, Marxists began planning for the World War II operation with the creation of that war’s two false opposition fronts, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party and the National Fascist Party in Italy. Benito Mussolini was a well known and influential Marxist before the Comintern ordered that he take up a new identity as leader of the National Fascist Party; Italian fascists held positions in the Comintern.
As for Adolf Hitler’s Marxist pedigree, one-third of Hitler’s SA and Gestapo personnel were ‘former’ Marxists whom Hitler ordered were to be immediately accepted into the ranks of the SS without any vetting:
“Adolf Hitler himself was the first to admit that National Socialism and Communism had much in common. ‘There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it,’ he once said in a revealing conversation, ‘There is, above all, revolutionary feeling…I have always made allowances for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social Democrat and the trade-union boss will never be a National Socialist, but the Communist always will.’ Hitler, in this case at least, was true to his word. After he seized power, he saw to it that thousands of Communists were enrolled in the NSDAP. They were particularly effective in the Gestapo and in the SA, where they formed perhaps a third of the total membership. Indeed, there were so many of them that they were given a special name. They were known popularly as the “Beefsteak Nazi” – Brown on the outside, Red on the inside.” — Robert G. L. Waite, Vanguard of Nazism: The Free Corps Movement in Postwar Germany 1918-1923
During the course of World War II Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, Chief of the Abwehr (German military intelligence), and General Reinhard Gehlen, Chief of the German General Staff’s intelligence unit for the Soviet Union and East European countries, Foreign Armies East (FHO), independently discovered that a group supervised by Deputy Führer Martin Bormann, second in command of Germany, was transmitting unsupervised coded radio messages to Moscow:
“Our suspicions were largely confirmed when, independently of one another, we found out that Bormann and his group were operating an unsupervised radio transmitter network and using it to send coded messages to Moscow. When OKW monitors reported this, Canaris demanded an investigation; but word came back that Hitler himself had emphatically forbidden any intervention: he had been informed in advance by Bormann of these Funkspiele, or fake radio messages, he said, and he had approved them.” — Reinhard Gehlen, The Service: The Memoires of General Reinhard Gehlen
…and after the war…
“It was not until after 1946, when I headed my own intelligence organization, that I had an opportunity to look into Bormann’s mysterious escape form Hitler’s Berlin bunker and his subsequent disappearance. Some time later I received conclusive proof of Bormann’s postwar movements. During the 1950s I was passed two separate reports from behind the Iron Curtain to the effect that Bormann had been a Soviet agent and had lived after the war in the Soviet Union under the cover as an advisor to the Moscow government, and has died in the meantime.” — General Reinhard Gehlen, “The Service: The Memoirs of General Reinhard Gehlen”, p. 71 (1972).
=================
* “As part of the program to destroy religion from within, the KGB, in the late 1950s, started sending dedicated young Communists to ecclesiastical academies and seminaries to train them as future church leaders. These young Communists joined the Church… at the call of the Communist Party… to implement its general line in the struggle against religion.
In the present phase, secret agents in the Catholic and other churches are being used to implement Communist strategy . When they achieve their Communist world victory, they will use mass withdrawal of their agents to disrupt and destroy the churches. ” – KGB defector Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, ‘The Perestrpika Deception, pp. 116-117, 1995.
https://ia800305.us.archive.org/27/items/AnatoliyGolitsyn/Golitsyn-ThePerestroikaDeception-TheWorldsSlideTowardsTheSecondOctoberRevolution1995.pdf
While Major Golitsyn’s reference to the “general line” is broader in scope than merely wiping out religion on the planet, in fact wiping out religion was the sole purpose of Marx’s adult life, known to only a relatively few within the Movement:
The essence of communism is to advance “The Struggle”, “The Struggle” entailing Karl Marx’s 1843 directive to implement the “abolition of religion”, and the destruction of those civilizations “whose spiritual aroma is religion” [see ADDENDUM]. Soon after transferring university from Bonn to Berlin, the young Karl Marx, up until then a warm-hearted Lutheran, ended up waging a war against God, because he accepted as true the Lutheran belief that his libertine behavior in Berlin consigned him to Hell. So Marx concocted a materialist philosophy based on a tautological foundation to wage war against God and humanity, as the following poems identify:
“Thus Heaven I’ve forfeited, I know it full well, My soul, once true to God, Is chosen for hell.”
…and…
“With disdain I will throw my gauntlet Full in the face of the world, And see the collapse of this pygmy giant Whose fall will not stifle my ardour. Then will I wander godlike and victorious Through the ruins of the world And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator.”
Marx’s Foundational Tautology
Marx writes (Chapter 24, first paragraph, Capital, 1867), “Hitherto we have investigated how surplus-value emanates from capital; we have now to see how capital arises from surplus-value.” See the tautology? Surplus value and capital are the same thing [see ADDENDUM II]! How did this tautology get past the initial reviews? How did this tautology survive the intervening 158 years without being discovered, except for this political scientist? This again illustrates the magnitude of the Marxist co-option of our institutions.
In Capital, Marx begins his analysis with an already existing capitalist economy. Marx can’t explain how the capitalist economy came into existence because such an economy couldn’t come into existence according to Marx’s peculiar analysis of the capitalist economy where surplus-value created capital must first exist, but since surplus-value doesn’t exist yet, there can be no capital to begin the capitalist economy. To overcome this inherent contradiction in Marx’s “investigation”, he begins Capital where we find an already existing capitalist economy:
“The wealth of those societies in which the capitalist mode of production prevails, presents itself as “an immense accumulation of commodities,” its unit being a single commodity. Our investigation must therefore begin with the analysis of a commodity.”
————————————-
ADDENDUM
Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Karl Marx (1843)
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
…and…
“The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.”
…and…
“It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world.”
Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, “The Struggle”…
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
ADDENDUM II
Marx recognizes the tautology (using diversion to hide the tautology by calling it a “vicious circle”), and, as usual with other self-imploding observations, erects a non-defense defense:
“Chapter Twenty-Six: The Secret of Primitive Accumulation We have seen how money is changed into capital; how through capital surplus-value is made, and from surplus-value more capital. But the accumulation of capital presupposes surplus-value; surplus-value presupposes capitalistic production; capitalistic production presupposes the pre-existence of considerable masses of capital and of labour power in the hands of producers of commodities. The whole movement, therefore, seems to turn in a vicious circle, out of which we can only get by supposing a primitive accumulation (previous accumulation of Adam Smith) preceding capitalistic accumulation; an accumulation not the result of the capitalistic mode of production, but its starting point.”
Marx’s solution to his tautology is to tell us that the Capitalist mode of production commenced by “supposing”! Marx magically creates a primitive accumulation of capital base upon which the capitalist mode of production flowered from, but this “supposing” primitive accumulation of capital doesn’t solve the tautology, it merely pushes the tautology further back in time. According to Marx, in order to have capital one needs surplus value (“capital arises from surplus value”), but surplus value can’t exist without first capital existing (“surplus value emanates from capital”)! Pushing back a tautology to an earlier time period doesn’t solve the tautology. Nothing can.
The history that wasn’t directed to your attention during school days that explains events currently taking place throughout the West:
(1) The World War I Allies conspire to not mine the Danish Straits, such mining allowing the Allies to control the Baltic Sea, which means the British and Russian navies can hook up, allowing troop landings all across the Baltic coastlines, resulting in Germany being knocked out of the war before the war begins; the mining of the Danish Straits checkmates Germany. However, Germany is allowed to mine the Danish Straits, knowing their critical importance to her entry into the looming war. Germany also bullies Denmark into placing mines in the straits. Once Germany moves on the straits, Britain and Russia conspire to not use their minesweepers to remove the mines!
Why isn’t this in our history books?
Why didn’t the press of the day sound the alarm about the critical importance of controlling the Danish Straits?
Where were the calls for inquiries into the Danish Straits fiasco that allowed World War I to take place?
(2) The World War I Allies conspired to not deploy the 50,000 strong Czech Legion to oust Lenin & Bolsheviks in Saint Petersburg. The Check Legion was encamped southeast of Kiev, 600 miles south of Saint Petersburg, but instead of sending the legion 600 miles north to destroy Lenin & Bolsheviks, the Allies send the legion 6,000 miles across Russia to Vladivostok for evacuation, thereby allowing the redeployment of one-million German soldiers from the Russian Eastern Front to the Western Front!
Why would the Allies want Russia out of the war, knowing they would now probably lose the war with the arrival on the Western Front of one-million German soldiers?
Who told the Bolshevik Central Committee that it was safe to go ahead with the Kerensky coup, allaying their fears that the Allies had no intention of easily destroying the Bolsheviks?
Why didn’t the press call for inquiries into the Czech Legion fiasco?
(3) The Indian Army’s first engagement in Europe easily penetrated German lines, thereby further identifying the Marxist co-option of the West’s institutions…
“The Indian Corps attacked it [village of Neuve Chapelle] on 10 March [1915]. It was the first recital of a story which was to become familiar: an artillery preparation, puny by later standards, which neither cut the wire properly nor destroyed the machine-guns; the enemy front line overrun, but the second wave of the attack inexplicably delayed for hours; then well-organized counter-attacks… His 2/3rd Gurkhas carried the village and first-line trenches, took three hundred prisoners and dug in. But the Garhwalis lost direction, inclined too much to the right, and came up against a belt of wire in which they tore gaps with bare hands. Eventually, having lost all their British Officers, they took about two hundred yards of enemy trench, but were separated from the rest of the brigade. It was the first time on the Western Front that the German line was broken. But the follow-up was a problem never solved. It was largely a matter of communications: telephone cable wire cut, runners shot and carrier pigeons unreliable. The Garhwali Brigade was in Neuve Chapelle by 9.30 a.m., but the Dehra Dun Brigade in support did not come forward until 4.00 p.m., and by that time the impetus of the attack was lost. They crossed the Des Layes stream, but had barely made contact with the enemy when they were withdrawn behind it.” — “The Indian Army and the King’s Enemies, 1900-1947”, by Charles Chenevix Trench (Thames and Hudson: New York, New York, 1988), p. 41.
Unreliable pigeons? How does a homing pigeon become unreliable? Pigeons were reliable for the Americans when they came late into the war. Cut telephone cable? How did Germans get behind the Allied unit to cut the cable? Runners shot? By whom? Germans behind the Allied unit? How did they get there? And why would a support unit wait for even thirty minutes to advance once the initial unit has disappeared from view? Obviously the initial unit would be known to be holding its ground and in need of assistance, since otherwise a rout would have long earlier had sepoy or German combatants returning back to their respective trenches. But this comedic spectacle of Allied imbecility isn’t a mere one-case occurrence at Neuve Chapelle. As Major Trench observes, the Allies refused to learn from their gross errors for the duration of the war, proving that the purpose for the war was to weaken Western Civilization.
(4) The operational commander for the 1916 Dublin ‘insurrection’, and the originator for the plan of general insurrection against the Union, was the Marxist intellectual James Connolly, who couldn’t let slip his true philosophical passion about Ireland and its institutions when he admitted years before the ‘insurrection’, “Ireland without her people is nothing to me…”* That means the nation of Ireland, the Irish nationality, the Irish nationality meaning the people of the island who identify as Irish, along with her religious based institutions, are abhorrent, as are nations to all Marxists; Marxists believe in a one-world Soviet totalitarian land mass devoid of religion.
“At the heart of the 1916 rising was a Marxist revolutionary socialist, James Connolly. This inconvenient truth was largely hidden from the Irish population for many decades. Nationalist Ireland preferred to portray Connolly as a Vincent de Paul-type figure who was “concerned” about poverty.”
https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/heritage/james-connolly-s-vision-never-realised-1.2556902
The long-term objective of these Marxists is to follow Marx’s orders to his disciples to implement the “abolition of religion” and destruction of those civilizations whose “spiritual aroma is religion”…
“Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right“, Karl Marx (1843)**
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
…and…
“The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.”
…and…
“It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world.”
Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, “The Struggle”…
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
Notice when the ‘insurrection’ took place…Easter Monday, a shot into the bow of religion in Ireland, as would make Marx proud of the profanation’s symbolism.
Of course, as is the case when Marxists take over a nation’s establishment, and as was seen in the USSR and China, the less hardcore Marxists are liquidated, as took place in Ireland under the misnomer-named Irish Civil War, where over one-thousand lost their lives.
———————————————
* https://www.marxists.org/archive/connolly/1900/07/comingen.htm
** https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/