After they deferred my case five times in a row, the United States Supreme Court denied to hear my case against Big Tech for their ongoing censorship and discrimination against conservatives.
While SCOTUS denied my case, there’s a silver lining – and a clear indication we’ll win this fight in the future!
On the same day as my denial, Justice Clarence Thomas released his opinion in another case involving President Trump and Twitter.
In that opinion, Justice Thomas specifically referred to MY CASE by its docket number saying:
While this case involves a suit against a public official, the Court properly rejects today a separate petition alleging that digital platforms, not individuals on those platforms, violated public accommodations laws, the First Amendment, and antitrust laws. Pet. for Cert., O. T. 2020, No. 20–969. The petitions highlight two important facts.
Today’s digital platforms provide avenues for historically unprecedented amounts of speech, including speech by government actors. Also unprecedented, however, is the concentrated control of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties. We will soon have no choice but to address how our legal doctrines apply to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms.
Read that last line again coming from Supreme Court Justice Thomas:
We will soon have NO CHOICE but to address how our legal doctrines apply to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms.
This sets the stage for what I’ve been working on for years with my legal team – and we’ll be filing another BOMBSHELL lawsuit very soon!
Join the fight now by funding my next lawsuit that will end Cancel Culture.
Justice Thomas used my lawsuit to acknowledge that it’s time to address the legal doctrines that Big Tech have been hiding behind to enable their censorship of conservatives and discriminatory practices.
The ball is in our court to make that happen!
Help me move forward by donating today.
Earlier this year, I made the tough decision to spend $50,000 on research and legal fees to start a very specific case against Big Tech – I’ll be able to release the details as soon as we file.
But this case is going to cost $250,000 or more and I have to rely on your support and the support of thousands of others to raise that significant amount of money.
Chip in today. $25, $50, $100 or more will get me closer to fully funding this lawsuit.
Now is the time and it’s up to us to make it happen.
You just saw it for yourself. The most respected Supreme Court justice just validated my legal work.
I’m thankful that Justice Thomas is listening and weighing in on my legal arguments, and I’m incredibly hopeful that we have a big win ahead of us that will help finally end Cancel Culture!
Thanks again for all that you do and please, chip in today!
Respectfully,
Laura Loomer
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/75658c6836a0d1088661965a34d05af62314dd4902569b7fec7e699718dc7926.png
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/69e8877fa602ccd7b471c4edb04da0c778ade97ea241908005f6c22420ba3c9e.png
So we win a battle but still lost the war. Where was SCOTUS when it would have made a difference? Why didn’t SCOTUS agree to take the 2020 Election Fraud cases? It shirked its duty and now is nothing but a rubber stamp for the Biden Regime.
The battle over the flow of uncensored information was won a century ago AGAINST the phone companies.
Just a matter of ruling that a server is merely a PBX that extends phone service….
[…] Justice Clarence Thomas Recognizes Laura Loomer’s Fight Against Big Tech Censorship In SCOTUS Opin… […]
[…] BREAKING: Justice Thomas recognizes Laura Loomer’s Fight In SCOTUS Opinion […]
Your chance for success was a very long shot anyway. SCOTUS doesn’t typically accept cases until they’ve been fought at trial in the lower courts. The vast majority of lawsuits never reach this stage.
There’s a group currently fighting a totally different tyranny battle. So far, their lawsuit has not been dismissed and continues to progress slowly through the system. They patiently watched as judges dismissed a lot of other cases like happened to yours. This helped their attorney to pursue a different and hopefully the correct legal argument.
Keep in mind every single lawsuit brought against Big Tobacco was dismissed until someone finally figured out what legal argument the presiding judge accepted as valid. It sucks that our court system works this way. It is what it is.
WTF … why is there no Gab or Minds share button
Screw Parler & MeWe