Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

Twitter Changes Terms Of Service To Allow Explicit Photos Of Children, Pedophile Content

Twitter has changed their terms of service to explicitly allow for pedophile-type content to be allowed on their platform.

The new terms of service explicitly states, “Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted.”

The new rule adds gray legalistic language that such pedophile content is allowed “provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way.”

Despite their qualifier, Twitter has stated it will allow for nude depictions of children on their platform as long as it is “artistic.”

“Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a limited number of scenarios e.g., works by internationally renowned artists that feature minors,” states Twitter’s new rule.

Dr. James Cantor, a homosexual and advocate for pedophiles that he refers to as “minor-attracted persons,” pushed for the change.

Last year, Cantor co-signed a letter to Twitter’s Director of Trust and Safety John Starr, urging Twitter to allow pedophiles access to its network and the ability to discuss their attraction to children on the massive social media platform.

Cantor was one of several academics that signed the letter, which refers to “Virtuous Pedophiles” and asked that they be allowed to network on Twitter.

The pedophile advocates claimed that if these so-called virtuous pedophiles aren’t allowed to network on Twitter, they will sexually abuse children.

“In our professional opinions, terminating the accounts of non-offending, anti-contact MAPs is likely to result in the opposite effect of that which Twitter may expect or intend. Rather than reducing the incidence of child sexual abuse, if anything, it increases the risk that some pedophiles will be unable to obtain the peer or professional support that they may need in order to avoid offending behavior. It is also likely to increase the stigma and isolation associated with pedophilia and thereby increase the likelihood of some MAPs acting on their sexual feelings,” stated the letter.

While Twitter has a well documented history of banning conservatives like Laura Loomer and Gavin McInnes, pedophiles are the latest protected class on Twitter, with special protections enshrined in the new terms of service.

Loomer was banned after stating facts regarding Representative Ilhan Omar. Loomer accurately stated that “Ilhan is pro Sharia. Ilhan is pro-FGM. Under Sharia, homosexuals are oppressed and killed. Women are abused and forced to wear the hijab. Ilhan is anti Jewish.”

947557 3deb55152d8a417a9b36992487899411~mv2

As Loomer wrote after she was banned, “Twitter claims to have a terms of service that outlines what behavior is and isn’t appropriate, but it is evident they selectively choose how to enforce their rules”

“Look at who else has been banned. Not the Nazis. Not the terrorist organizations. Not the racists. Not the violent members of ANTIFA. Not the world dictators. They’re all still on Twitter, and many of them are still verified. Who has Twitter banned? The popular, influential conservative and libertarian voices including myself, Chuck Johnson, Milo Yiannopoulos, Roger Stone, Alex Jones, Gavin McInnes, Tommy Robinson, John Guandolo, and Jesse Kelly.”

Loomer added, “Put simply, Twitter is funded by Saudi Arabia and thus their terms of service policies are pro-Sharia and anti-First Amendment. This is why Twitter keeps banning conservatives. I am not the first nor will I be the last. If you believe in the First Amendment and free speech, then you, too, could be next.”

“Right now, Twitter, Facebook, Google and Apple think they are too big to be stopped, but that is not true. If Constitutionalists stand together and unite, we can stop all of this censorship. If we do not allow for both sides of the political spectrum to be heard, we will quickly become a totalitarian state. This is how tyranny begins: not with screams and bloodshed, but with compliance and silence.”

26 COMMENTS

  1. Twitter seems to forget that pedophiles, promotion of and advocacy for sex with minors, and nude depictions of minor children all appeal to pedophiles. So now Twitter seems to be condoning child sexual exploitation of minors. Attorney General Barr must stop Twitter in this outrageous policy. And Twitter unjustly bans and removes accounts of Conservatives and those opposed to sodomy. What ever happened to Free Speech and our First Amendment?

  2. I recently read a comment…”Nothing happened in Sodom and Gomorrah that exceeds the wickedness and depravity of today. Unspeakable wickedness and perversion were once hidden in dark places; now they are in the open, even accorded legal protection. At Sodom and Gomorrah they were localized. Now they are spread across the world and they are among us.” Interesting comment.

  3. The Left works in increments, so that cultural rot that initially shocks becomes gradually mainstream. They clearly want pedophilia legalized.

  4. Of course, I agree with you boomers that LITERAL and WESTERN-focused images of ACTUAL child pornography, pedophilia, and “child drag queens” are sickening and horrible that they must be banned for life, but,

    Anime (especially cute/kawaii anime girls) is not AND NEVER WILL BE “child pr0n”, “p3dophilia” or “child abuse”. Anime never harms anyone.

    Anime is 100% fiction not REALITY.

    Learn the difference between real life and fiction, boomers.

    • Phychopaths can fantisize their desires to perform such harmful behavior to such an extent such fantasising perpetuates action. All media is a medium that aids fantasy.

    • Sorry zoomer, but you’re mixing up pedophilia with the crime it’s commonly associated with, which is child rape.
      If loli or shota makes your dick hard, sorry you’re still a pedophile. You might not’ve diddled any real kids, but you still fall under the classification of pedophile. Sorry to inform you.
      You can check the DSM-5 if you don’t believe me.

    • Fictional depictions of minors in sexual ways is actually considered child p*rn in some countries, and you can get arrested for distributing, creating, or owning it. Pedophiles often use fictional stuff like pedophilic anime ships to groom real children.

      • Not everyone who likes anime is a p3d0ph1le. IN FACT, have you seen an ACTUAL p3d0ph1le who likes anime or anything Japanese? I don’t even think so. Not a snowball’s chance in Hell had I encountered a literal p3d0phile who is into anime. Only idiots and b00mers and low IQ idjits conflate anime with “child pr0n” this or “objectification of women” that.
        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/aafd7c545332e3dd7b48c82e22ba70767d04842fdebf0499452a176ea251e4db.png
        In fact, one of the most notorious anime haters (Drpizza) are even WORSE abusers of children than the anime fans they blindly accuse of as “p3d0philes”.

        • Um… p*dophiles can literally be anybody and they can look like anybody. There have been cases of p*dophiles who have been caught with anime child p*rn as well as real child p*rn. They were caught with the anime child p*rn first, and this led investigators to believe that the suspect also had real child p*rn. Fictional child p*rn is a grey area in most countries. It can get you into trouble in some cases, but not all of the time, and there are ways around it. P*dophiles have used p*dophilic ships involving an anime child and an anime adult to groom and lure minors to them, and I’ve seen it happen in the fandom that I’m in. Someone in my fandom has actually been charged with aggravated child mol*station, and they were pretty famous in the fandom too. It’s not just anime either, it happens in regular cartoon fandoms too and other things that are more dominated by children. I’m aware that not everyone who likes anime is a p*dophile, when and where did I say that? I love anime, I’m an adult, and I’m not one, my friends love anime too and they aren’t like that either. There’s no need to defend anime so much, because no one said that only p*dophiles like it. Not everyone who likes anime is a good person. Bad people can like it. Good people can like it too. Since some anime are geared to children, p*dophiles find it easier to get access to children that way, and also, there are a lot of weird p*dophilia tropes in anime that I’m sure do appeal to p*dophiles. Again, not all people who like anime are p*dophiles, but to say that p*dophiles can’t like anime is a little much. And how do you know you’ve never encountered a p*dophile who likes anime? Especially over the internet. Do you think they’re going to be upfront and tell you that they are or something?

          TL;DR: I never said everyone who likes anime is a p*dophile, but there are p*dophiles who like anime, and have harmed children or tried to using it in someway, I’ve witnessed it. Anyone can like anime, good or bad people.

    • Fictional depictions of minors in sexual ways is actually considered child p*rn in some countries, and you can get arrested for distributing, creating, or owning it. Pedophiles often use fictional stuff like pedophilic anime ships to groom real children.

  5. 10kg weighted vest

    Reduced obesity for weighted-vest wearers -iamazonsurmountwayweightedvest_2021 Scientists have found a new method of reducing human body weight and fat mass using weighted vests. Are you ready for a weight vest? Just in case you weren’t aware, weight…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles

spot_img

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts