Earlier today, Adam Schiff announced the release of transcripts of disgraced Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch. Without fail, the corrupt partisan faux impeachment crew decided to ONLY allow access to “Key excerpts from Yovanovitch’s testimony”.
It seems that Schiff is using the old drop fake news and put in small print retraction – allowing only KEY excerpts that suit his narrative so everyone reports with that information and a few hours or days later release the full transcript. It’s the same strategy that the Failing New York Times and Washed Up Washington Post implement when they deliver fake news. Their retraction is in 8pt (8 point size) font buried at the bottom of some page, or in a tweet that maybe gets 30 likes compared to 40,000 likes and 40,000 retweets of the fake news put out. It’s like saying things in court to a jury and the judge saying “disregard”. Yeah, right. They already heard it.
This Schiff version of the transcripts make Marie Yovanovitch look like Dr. Ford and give the impression of “bravery”. It’s laughable and highly concerning that the House Intelligence Committee would exclude all other testimony. This is not how it works.
Yovanovitch’s testimony proves their “Ukraine Plan” strategy was put in motion around February 2019. They had to ensure Joe Biden would run for president, since he didn’t announce his candidacy until April 25, 2019 to tie this into opposition research, Ukraine nuclear energy deals, and the phone call on July 25, 2019.
RELATED: Breaking: Democrats Send Letter To AG Barr Demanding a Special Counsel, As Graham Suggested
What is most telling about her testimony? Giuliani and Durham were investigating the crimes committed in Ukraine before November 7, 2018, and Barr was nominated late November 2018. That means that the narrative by Feinstein that Barr is compromised and must recuse himself, further demonstrates their desperate attempt to smear the president and perpetuate this clown show.
For the record, it doesn’t matter what is being purported by Schiff (aka the whistleblower), they want to make this look like something else. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, which is the only speculatory charge they can use that may include HIGH CRIMES. The thing is, Durham has been investigating the Ukrainian crimes committed for over 2 years. The secret meetings that Barack Hussein Obama and his close confidants (Mark Stroh etc) had with Ukrainian officials to help PROVE Russia hacking and or collusion, the coordination of efforts to insert themselves into the Trump administration, and obfuscation of evidence are all coming into focus.
I don’t think people are paying attention. This phone call has nothing to do with the testimony being provided. This is bait and switch. The whistleblower, aka Adam Schiff, is irrelevant because the CALL TRANSCRIPT speaks for itself. They are going after Ukrainian collusion now. By the way, what happened to Bill Taylor? Why is no one talking about how Bill Taylor had sent contemporaneous cables in the past to lay foundations of “insurance”?
There was no Russia collusion. There is no Ukrainian collusion. What we have is a foggy bottom clique of clowns orchestrating the overthrow of a duly elected government.
Latest posts by Tore (see all)
- Democrats | Organ Harvesting PUSH Targets Children As Young As 14 - December 5, 2019
- Citizen Grand Jury | Comment About Barron Trump Was The Last Straw - December 5, 2019
- Schiff’s BFF Ukrainian Igor Pasternak Has Been Advising U.S. On Ukraine For Decades - December 2, 2019