In a shocking act of big tech’s assault on the Constitution and an act of technological totalitarianism in Silicon Valley, the Trump administration is reportedly considering a proposal that would allow companies like Google and Apple to collect data on Americans for the sake of identifying mentally ill people who shouldn’t own a gun.

The proposal is part of an initiative that would create a new government agency called the Health Advanced Research Projects Agency (HARPA), which would be an ad on to the Health and Human Services Department whose director would be appointed by the President.

HARPA’S stated goal is to identify early signs of changes in people with mental illness that could lead to violent behavior, indicators that would prevent those people from obtaining weapons. However, the creepily dystopian details in the proposal are raising some eyebrows and major privacy concerns.

The Daily Caller Reported:

“HARPA would take after Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, which serves as the research arm for the Pentagon. The idea was first crafted in 2017 but has since gotten a renewed push after mass shootings killed 31 people in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, in August.

The Suzanne Wright Foundation approached the president recently and proposed the agency include a project called Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by Helping Overcome Mental Extremes, or Safe Home, the report notes, citing two people familiar with the matter.

President Donald Trump has a close relationship with Bob Wright, who founded the foundation after his wife died of cancer. Wright was a former chair of NBC and occupied that position while the president hosted “The Apprentice.” (RELATED: 20 People Dead After El Paso Shooting, Governor Says)

HARPA would develop “breakthrough technologies with high specificity and sensitivity for early diagnosis of neuropsychiatric violence,” according to a copy of the proposal. “A multi-modality solution, along with real-time data analytics, is needed to achieve such an accurate diagnosis.”

One of the most disturbing aspects of the proposal are the tech companies listed in the document who would be responsible for collecting data, establishing algorithms, and suggesting to the government who is mentally ill, and who shouldn’t be allowed to own a gun.

Following the Dayton and El Paso mass shootings, President Trump said he might support background checks for all gun purchases and “red flag” laws to deny guns to people deemed a danger to themselves or others.

But who gets to decide whether or not someone is a danger to themselves or others? Is heresy enough to get your guns confiscated? What happens when people are deemed a “danger” in acts of political retaliation?

Well, that is already happening, and it’s the big tech social media companies that are labeling innocent people with no criminal history as “dangerous individuals”, simply because they are Republican and support President Trump.


On May 2, 2019, Facebook banned a group of prominent Trump supporters from Facebook and Instagram on the grounds that they were “dangerous individuals”. I was one of those people branded as “dangerous” by Facebook. The media went on to report that I am “dangerous”, even though I don’t have a criminal record and have never once committed a violent crime. The same week that Facebook deemed me and other Republicans “dangerous”, Facebook was caught supporting ISIS propaganda by allowing the Islamic terrorist organization to use Facebook for recruitment.

Facebook justifies their banning of non-violent conservatives like Laura Loomer, Milo Yiannopoulos, Roger Stone, Alex Jones, and Paul Jospeh Watson by labeling them as “dangerous individuals”.

When big tech is given the power to determine who can and can’t have guns, will they mark ISIS as “mentally ill”?

In a complaint submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission, a whistle blower alleged that Facebook has been auto generating video propaganda for ISIS and is failing to remove blatantly obvious ISIS symbols, including profile banners of the ISIS flag.

The complaint includes a study that shows Facebook used its auto-generating feature to produce videos that inadvertently help ISIS’s exploits.

According to Facebook’s policy rationale regarding “dangerous individuals and organizations”,

“Facebook does not allow any organizations or individuals that proclaim a violent mission or are engaged in violence, from having a presence on Facebook. This includes:

Terrorist activity

Organized hate

Mass or serial murder

Human trafficking

Organized violence or criminal activity

There are actual dangerous individuals and groups on social media…but they aren’t conservative.

They are Islamic terrorist organizations.

When Facebook banned Loomer, Yiannopoulos, Jones, and Watson as “dangerous individuals”, Facebook essentially designated those who were banned as terrorists and violent criminals.

But, they had nothing to say about ISIS, HAMAS, and Muslim Brotherhood, and why these violent terrorist organizations are allowed on Facebook.


Why on earth would the Trump administration want to partner with these companies to “detect mass shooters” when these companies are literally supporting terrorists who murder innocent non-Muslims around the world everyday with explosives and high powered weapons?

Is the Trump administration even aware that these big tech companies are providing material support to foreign and domestic terrorist organizations by giving them access to social media?

Some of the companies mentioned in the proposal include Google and Apple whose Apple Watches, Amazon Echo, Fitbit, and Google Home devices would be used to “collect  enormous amounts of data and scientific rigor”, according to Geoffrey Ling, the lead scientific adviser on HARPA. These devices would detect “neurobehavioral signs” of “someone headed toward a violent explosive act” and use artificial intelligence to create a “sensor suite” to flag mental changes in people who use these devices. Algorithms created by the far-left social media companies would then use this data to determine if someone is likely to commit a mass shooting.

Apple Watches, Amazon Echo, Fitbit, and Google Home devices are devices used by people in the privacy of their own homes, which begs the question:

Is HARPA planning to illegally spy on American citizens who use these devices in their homes to listen to their private conversations, collect personal medical information on users, or even worse, record people on video and audio while they are having what they believe to be confidential interactions in their homes?

From the looks of the proposal, that’s exactly what seems to be the plan.

People use these devices in every room of their house, and use the apps on devices like the Apple Watch to keep track of their personal health. There have already been numerous instances of these devices spying on people, recording them having sex, and human contractors listening to audio files recorded by Siri and Alexa from within people’s homes.

“Amazon’s Alexa recorded private conversation and sent it to random contact”


Let’s examine a few hypothetical scenarios that could happen to any of us.

1. You just lost a family member you were close to and have been struggling with depression since they died. You book an appointment with a therapist and psychiatrist to discuss your grief. You put your appointment date in your Google calendar. The doctor gives you a prescription for an anti-depressant for 2 months. You put a reminder in your Apple Watch to take your medicine. Apple and Google now know you saw a psychiatrist and are taking medicine temporarily. Apple and Google put this info in a database, and 4 years after you recover and are no longer taking anti-depressants, someone breaks into your home and robs you at gunpoint. You decide you want to buy a gun to protect yourself. You go to buy a gun, and are told you can’t buy a gun because Apple and Google say you are “mentally ill”.

2. You’re hanging out with your friends and your friend takes an embarrassing picture of you and jokingly threatens to post it on social media. You jokingly respond by saying “I’m going to kill you! You better not!” Your Alexa or Google Home device records you saying “I’m going to kill you” (even though you said it jokingly), and documents you as a “dangerous potential mass shooter” in their database. You go into a gun store one day and try to buy a gun and are told you can’t because big tech recorded your private playful comment with your friend in the privacy of your own home.

Should Apple and Google be allowed to eradicate your Second Amendment right and violate HIPPA laws by sharing your personal health information that you put inside your private phone with law enforcement or gun shops? Should they be allowed to record you in the privacy of your own home and use your jokes against you?

This has the potential to go very wrong extremely fast, and the potential for abuse is high, especially given the fact that the big tech social media companies, all of which are run by Far-Left billionaires, have been caught weaponizing themselves as political agents for the Democrat Party both before and after the 2016 presidential election.

The HARPA proposal is a reactive approach to several mass shootings in the United States, but more big brother surveillance is not an appropriate solution to dealing with gun violence or mental illness. In fact, the proposal itself could potentially lead to political violence and political retaliation against political dissidents, particularly Trump supporters, who have been targeted by politically Google, Apple, Twitter, and Facebook. Several of these companies have been caught employing members of ANTIFA and taking meetings with CAIR, a designated Islamic terrorist organization. ANTIFA members have tried to murder Trump supporters, and some of their members work for big tech social media companies. CAIR, was found to support HAMAS, a terror org that murders Jews.

Should members of violent groups like ANTIFA who work for these big tech companies be deciding who can and can’t own a gun if HARPA becomes a funded agency within the US Government?

It is unclear whether or not President Trump’s advisors have made the President aware of how severe big tech totalitarianism currently is in the United States, but if President Trump truly understood how biased and violent these companies are, he would most likely completely abandon this absurd proposal.

President Trump is an extremely busy man. He is the leader of the free world, and he can’t possibly know about all of the civil rights violations against Republicans that are being committed in the United States against his supporters by big tech.

Why would President Trump want to align with tech companies that have been caught on camera admitting to censoring and throttling President Trump and his supporters with the stated goal of preventing him from winning re-election in 2020?

There is a trove of evidence which documents the abuse of power by big tech, abuses that will only increase if big tech is brought on to surveil the private communications of Americans as a means to “combat and predict mass shooters”.

Executives of every major big tech company are undeniably Left-leaning, and have donated millions of dollars to Democrat politicians who have proclaimed their desire to eradicate the Second Amendment. These same social media companies that are being proposed to single out “mentally ill” Americans are the same platforms that have been caught employing ANTIFA members and allowing ISIS, HAMAS, Muslim Brotherhood and the KKK to have social media.

Who is to say that these social media companies won’t accuse all Republicans of being mentally ill and unfit to own a gun in an effort to disarm Republicans?

If President Donald Trump’s tweets reveal anything, it’s that President Trump is clearly not the main force behind this proposal. In his own words, President Trump accused Google of “trying to rig the election”. President Trump is correct. Google is trying to rig the election. So why is his administration possibly partnering with Google to surveil Americans under HARPA?

Trump constantly tweets about social media bias and even tweeted this week about how Google  manipulated votes to help former Secretary of State and twice failed Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton ahead of the 2016 presidential election. 

Even more evidence that President Trump is surrounded by some ill informed advisors who are trying to push his administration to align with big tech is the stark comparison between his recent White House actions addressing big tech’s bias.

On July 11, President Trump hosted a social media summit at the White House where he proclaimed: “A big subject today at the White House Social Media Summit will be the tremendous dishonesty, bias, discrimination and suppression practiced by certain companies. We will not let them get away with it much longer. The Fake News Media will also be there, but for a limited period..”

President Trump said in his own words “we will not let {big tech companies] get away with [bias and discrimination] much longer”, but the HARPA proposal would give these totalitarian tech companies even more power than they have ever had before.

While Republicans like to think that President Trump is surrounded by trusted advisors, the reality is, he is surrounded by both good and bad apples, some of whom are trying to sabotage him through their actions and policies, which is why this proposal must be looked at with high levels of concern and speculation.

As this site reported, President Trump’s personal assistant Madeleine Westerhout was terminated this week after it was discovered she leaked information to the Washington Post’s White House bureau chief Philip Rucker. According to the New York Times, Westerhout’s “resignation” came after President Trump found out she had “shared details about his family and the Oval Office operations she was involved in at a recent off-the-record dinner with reporters during the president’s working vacation.”

Madeleine Westerhout is walking, breathing proof that not all of President Trump’s staffers and advisors have his best interest in mind, which is why President Trump’s supporters are very concerned about his administration’s proposal to align with big tech on a Second Amendment issue.

According to the Washington Post, “Every time this has been brought up inside the White House — even up to the presidential level, it’s been very well-received,” a person familiar with discussions said. “HARPA is the health-care equivalent of DARPA, and it’s a great legacy project for the president, one he is uniquely positioned to get done.”

There is no denying HARPA contradicts everything the President has said thus far regarding big tech social media bias and censorship.

If HARPA is allowed to progress, increased targeting of Republicans can and will happen. Here is evidence of why big tech companies like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Twitter must NEVER be allowed to have the power to determine who is and isn’t allowed to exercise their Second Amendment right. Under no reason whatsoever should President Trump’s administration be working with any of the Left-leaning big tech companies to collect mental health data on Americans for the sake of predicting shootings. These companies, especially Google, have proven that they cannot be trusted, and they have proven that they will do anything in their power to sabotage Republicans and President Trump.

I voted for President Trump, and I plan on voting for him again. But, this is a question we should all be asking.


I highly doubt it was President Trump… Especially given that this proposal is coming to light ahead of a presidential election year where gun control is always a top campaign issue.

If you’re reading this and have a way to send it to President Trump, please do ASAP.

Here is a portion of some of the data and research regarding big tech social media bias with citations from news reports that have been placed into a spreadsheet by investigators at LauraLoomer.US.

This research proves that big tech, especially Google, is working directly with the Democrats to advance Democrat policies, INCLUDING GUN CONTROL AND GUN ABOLITION, and are actively suppressing search results to harm President Trump and Republican candidates. This has been happening for years, and it’s time for the Trump administration to immediately punish big tech for their crimes instead of finding ways to work with them.

– (June 10th 2016) Trump Slams Google: ‘Disgrace’ If They Changed Results To Favor Clinton

(July 27th 2016) Trump And Johnson Left Off Google Results For ‘Presidential Candidate’

(August 12th 2016) Tech Companies Apple, Twitter, Google and Instagram Collude to Defeat Trump

(August 9th 2017) Rebels of Google: Senior Management ‘On The Verge Of Tears’ After Trump Win

(April 19th 2018) Google Lawsuit: Senior Engineer Alon Altman Wanted to Sabotage Trump’s Android Phone, Ban His Gmail Account

(June 1st 2018) Left Wing Candidate Recruitment Fundraiser Moved Out of Google’s D.C. Office

(August 30th 2018) Report: Over 1,000 Big Tech Executives Donated to Democratic SuperPAC ActBlue Since 2015

– (September 10th 2018) Report: 90 Percent of Political Donations from Google Go to Democrats

(September 20th 2018) Google Employees Discussed Tweaking Search Results to Counter Trump Travel Ban

(October 24th 2018) Google Employees Second Largest Donors to Beto O’Rourke Campaign

(December 11th 2018) Google CEO Sundar Pichai Can’t Explain Why Trump Tops Image Search for ‘Idiot’

(March 11th 2019) Google Manager Said Company Must Stop ‘Fake News’ Because ‘That’s How Trump Won’

(March 22nd 2019) Research: Google Search Bias Flipped Seats for Democrats in Midterms

(June 24th 2019) Project Veritas – Google Exec Decries Trump’s Election: ‘How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again’

(June 26th 2019) Donald Trump: Google ‘Trying to Rig the Election’

(July 16th 2019) Trump Pledges to Look into Google After Peter Thiel Accuses Tech Giant of ‘Treason’

(August 6th 2019) Donald Trump: ‘We Are Watching Google Very Closely!’