Sunday, September 13, 2026

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

Rashida Tlaib Slapped With $2 Million Lawsuit For Alleged Battery, Assault Of Laura Loomer

“Hate-filled anti-Semitic” Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) is being sued for $2 million after the freshman congresswoman attacked investigative reporter Laura Loomer during a campaign event in 2018.

The conservative non-profit Freedom Watch and its general counsel Larry Klayman, a former federal prosecutor, filed the complaint on behalf of Loomer on Friday, charging Tlaib with assault and battery and religious discrimination.

Tlaib, who adamantly supports boycotting Israel and has been repeatedly slammed by President Donald Trump for “hating Jews,” is seen assaulting Loomer, a female Jewish journalist, during a rally during her Congressional run.

Freedom watch detailed the alleged assault in a press release announcing the lawsuit.

“Ms. Loomer, who herself is now running for US Congress in Florida’s 21st Congressional District did not bring this complaint for political purposes, but to hold Tlaib accountable for her unhinged hatred of Jews and Israel, which manifested itself in Tlaib’s physical attack on Loomer, which was caught on camera,” Freedom Watch writes. During the campaign event which Tlaib attended in support of Omar’s candidacy in 2018, Loomer asked simple and straightforward questions of the future Congresswoman about her stances toward Israel, Jews and terrorist groups such as Hamas.

“In response, and in the presence of Omar, who looked on approvingly, Tlaib violently lunged at Loomer, interacted with her physically and grabbed her phone, which Loomer was using to film the event which took place at a Palestinian restaurant. This put Loomer in alleged fear of immediate severe bodily injury.” 

Following the alleged assault, Loomer filed a criminal complaint against Tlaib with the Minneapolis Police Department, but the department has yet to follow up on the case.

“Likely because the police do not want to be smeared as ‘Islamophobic’ by Tlaib and Omar, especially given that Minnesota’s powerful Attorney General, Keith Ellison, who is a Muslim political ally of Tlaib and Omar, is also an anti-Semite and close to Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam,” Freedom Watch asserts.

Loomer is waging the legal battle to assure that “this hate-filled anti-Semitic Congresswoman can be held to account to the rule of American law, rather than the Sharia law she and her sister radical Muslim Congresswoman Omar pledge their primary allegiance to,” the press release concludes.

LAURA LOOMER FILES $3 BILLION LAWSUIT AGAINST FACEBOOK FOR DEFAMATION

The lawsuit against Tlaib comes just days after Tlaib and Omar, who were among 17 members of Congress who voted against a resolution condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, were blocked from entering Israel.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu explained the decision to bar them from entry at length on his office’s official Twitter account. Tlaib and Omar’s itinerary “revealed that they planned a visit whose sole objective is to strengthen the boycott against us and deny Israel’s legitimacy,” Netanyahu noted.

Tlaib had previously rejected invitations to travel with other congressional members of both parties. Trips were organized by AIPAC to give new members briefings on security issues and include political perspectives from the government as well as critics.

Freedom Watch and Loomer are also waging a major legal battle against Big Tech.

A District of Columbia Court of Appeals agreed on Wednesday to hear the merits of a lawsuit Loomer filed accusing Apple, Facebook, Google and Twitter of colluding to “intentionally and willfully suppress politically conservative content.”

In March, a DC federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, claiming the plaintiffs did not present justifiable and viable legal claims about the social media companies’ alleged ideologically motivated bias and conspiracy against them.

The DC Court of Appeals, however denied the motion and will hear the merits of the suit.

The complaint alleges the tech giants are in violation of the Sherman Act, District of Columbia’s public accommodation law, the First Amendment, and claims the tech giants’ ban against Loomer has caused her “to suffer severe financial injury.”

25 COMMENTS

  1. As a person of Askenazi Descent and mostly Irish and English (Just like Harrison Ford) These Palestinian supporters are actually supporting hard core terrorists. If the Palestinians wanted to be their own country all their leadership would need to do is 1. Recognize Israel’s right to exist and 2. Declare independence and that would be that. The suffering of the Palestinian people is all the fault of their leadership. Their leadership would rather think they could wipe Israel off the map than get along and declare independence and then take care of their people in a democratic manner. Oh yeah the Palestinian leadership are Marxist Dictators and don’t believe in Democracy. I forgot about that…

    • Really, you woke up, gargled urine, ran out of your tent in your underwear to come all the here to just say that?
      I’m impressed by how much stupid can motivate you!

  2. Thank you Ms Laura Loomer for standing up for liberty, freedom and America. Our prayers and support are with you. Stay in the battle, keep the faith.

    • uninformed – info wart,
      I know you’re just a plant by Loomers people to see our response to post like yours.
      Truly, if you were real you would never had a clue on how to find this site, you still haven’t found your last pair of glasses you lost.
      Stuuuuuuupid!

    • And what happened about all of this B.S. NOTHING! Because it was total Zionist B.S. right along with these “right wing” stooges and fools from the beginning.

  3. I 1st heard of you from Gavin McInnis – who said supportive things. I began to have interest when I saw you protesting in front of Jack Dorsey’s home. NOW… you have my undivided attention.
    Fortune favors the Bold. Go forth and Represent!

  4. THE AMERICAN DEMOCRATS HAVE NEVER BEEN “LIBERALS”

    $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

    The following was written to address the current political situation in America — but these principles apply to all nations and to all people, everywhere….Hong Kong, today, for example — and Iran.

    SPARKS FROM WYATT’S TORCH — LIBERALISM RECLAIMED!

    “There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism — by vote. It is merely the difference between murder, and suicide.”

    — Ayn Rand

    What the USA needs is a truly LIBERAL president and congress and judiciary!

    And I forgive the reader for suspecting that this must be some kind of bad joke!

    But the American Democrats believe in “statism” — not “liberalism.”

    Strip them naked of their “liberal” camouflage and behold their ugliness.

    They benefit from the imprecise American political terminology —- we say “the government” here in the USA —- rather than “the state.” And that’s a dangerous problem.

    Famous brands of statism in recent centuries have been Nazism [National Socialism], socialism, “democratic” socialism, “social democracy,” fascism, communism, progressivism, and welfare statism —- these last two are mixtures of fascism and socialism.

    Note that these statists are all joined-at-the-hip and on-the-same-page in their common contempt, enmity, and disdain for human rights.

    Liberalism, on the other hand, is a political philosophy of small, cheap government —- it is a constabulary —- and the job of a liberal government is to enforce human rights within its own jurisdiction.

    What “human rights?”

    I speak of the unalienable and perfectly-natural and universally-valid human rights of life, liberty, private property [beginning with self-ownership], and the pursuit of personal happiness.

    A slave is owned by someone other than himself — but a free man owns himself.

    The first article of private property is “the self” — and all other rights are derivatives of and flow from these cardinal rights.

    These rights —- The Rights of Man —- are the gift of nature or of nature’s god —- and they belong to all human beings, everywhere.

    Show me a Democrat who subscribes to all of the above, without qualifications or weasel words.

    Observe the connection between “liberty” and “liberalism.” The words “liberal” and “liberalism” were hijacked by the Democrats, socialists, progressives, and fascists, long ago —- and it was the mistake of conservatives and libertarians to let them get away with it.

    “Liberalism” requires the defense and promotion of “individual liberty” — and today’s fake “liberals” are busily and maliciously destroying it.

    “Liberalism” is 1] individual “liberty,” 2] private property — starting with self-ownership — and 3] CAPITALISM.

    It is long past time that liberalism be reclaimed, defined, and explained by its rightful owners —- by the champions of freedom, i.e.: not by Democrats.

    Friends of freedom! Friends of peace-through-strength! And friends of prosperity!

    Declare yourselves to be “liberals,” then —- and kick over the bloody coffee tables — and overthrow and trounce the Democrats — now and forever! Drive them into the sea!

    =====================================

    START A PRAIRIE FIRE!

    START A TEA PARTY TSUNAMI!

    START A TAXPAYER REBELLION AGAINST THE TAX-EATERS!

    SHARE THESE SENTIMENTS WITH YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS, AND NEIGHBORS, TODAY! $

    AND CHECK OUT AYN RAND’S “CAPITALISM: THE UNKNOWN IDEAL” — AND HER REMARKS ELSEWHERE ON THE ORIGIN OF RIGHTS, HERE, FOR EXAMPLE, AT — http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/individual_rights.html AND https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGtsOecU_K0&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR1C0WZvwluNSj31G4qarHtBiQA8GVFWCAyFkCAD_H7HCUrcQFt7JS_v0tI

  5. ROUNDS COOKING OFF: On the Nazi-Fascist Democrat party’s “ENEMIES LIST”

    The Democrats have this “enemies list” — denominated in epithets and insults aimed at the people whose wallets they wish to hijack and take up residence inside. You can be a “Ra cist!” and you can be a “Terrorist!” and you can be a “Dictator” and you can be a “Hostage-taker!” and you can “Wear a tinfoil hat!” and you can be a “Hom ophobe!” and you can be a “Te aba gger!” — a ho mose xual man taking his partner’s s cro tum into his mouth. You can be “Selfish!” and you can be a “Wa cko!” and you can be a “Hick!” and you can be a “Rube!” and you can be “Uneducated” and you can be an “Extremist!”

    You can be a “Right-wing-nut!” and you can be “Me ntally Ill” and you can be “Dera nged!” and you can be a “Flake!” and you can be “Se xist!” and you can be a “Warmonger!” and you can be “Unenlightened!” and you can be a “FatCat!” and you can be a “Greedy!” member of the productive class, and you can be a “Na zi!” and you can be a “Fa sci st!” — although no one more closely approaches the precise description of “N azi!” or “F as cist!” than the usual Democrat propagandist — either official, or self-appointed.

    Lies, after all, are the heart and soul and the sword and shield of the Na zi-F asc ist Democrat party — and of all the rest of the left-wing trash. Their next-best debate tactic is censorship — to shut-up their critics — whom they are too intellectually incompetent to best in debate.

    So all you have to do to occupy multiple epithets on the Democrats’ enemies list is to insist that they take their hands off yourself, off your wallet, off your property, off your kids, off your diet, off your healthcare, off your household appliances, off your car, off your bank account, off your weapons of self-defense, off your liberty, and off your freedom of speech.

    Insist on all these good things — and that qualifies you to be spat upon by na sty, mean-spirited sc um — by The Friends of All Mankind — by a mob of lying, thieving, dope-smoking, pill-popping, coke-snorting, sticky-fingered, bloo dsu cking, tax-eating, gun-stealing, predatory humanitarian hoodlums, thugs and gangsters, by their pickpockets and pe cksniffs, by their spies, spooks, sneaks and snoops, by their bu msn iffers and pe cke rcheckers who seek to silence their critics — by their defenders in the fascist, Democrat-captured media — Sniffy, Snippy, Snotty, and Snooty, by their Mikhail Suslovs, their Josef Goe bbels, and their Leni Riefenstahls, by their principal attorneys, Manny, Moe and Jack, Rooty, Tooty, Fresh and Frooty, Brutish, Nasty and Short, Snap, Crackle, and Pop — by the fre ak show — by the blo ody zoo — by the Star-Wars-bar-scene Democrat party, in other words.

    We are ruled by their armed force and by fraud. No political party in the history of America more profoundly deserves absolute and outright destruction. Drive them into the sea.

    ==========================

    Start a prairie fire!

    Start a tea party tsunami!

    Start a taxpayer rebellion against the tax-eaters!

    Share these sentiments with your family, friends, and neighbors, today! $

  6. It seems to be a clear cut case.
    The video tells the story.
    If there’s ANY justice in America, then Laura should win this suit hands down.
    GOOD LUCK in your bid for that congressional seat, Laura. We’re ALL rooting for you!

  7. there is always that one soy boy white knight, Haha Poof,you will be the first thrown off the roof, if these people had their way

  8. Loomer is right, never allow a muslim into congress.
    Sharia law in not American Law!
    The muslims fail to assimilate into American culture.
    To all other cultures, why come to America to practice your religion and culture?!
    The very detrimental effects that religion and culture had in your country, you practice it in America?
    Stupid!

  9. This $2M lawsuit, if won, will probably send a message to the lefty tyrants (and I use “probably” here as in probably some demoncraps might not accept this as a lesson if they’re persistently self-righteous). What’s worse than an immature lawyer-turned-congress”woman” in the house? I’d say also having sorry excuse of another “woman” in congress who sounds like a somalian-made embarrassment every time she opens her mouth……that would be Ilhan Omar. The fact the she commited incest to gain some legal status or benefit, and then the rumors of her trysting with someone else in the white house likely explains why she sounds like a disgusting embarrassment (to not use a filthier way to address her). Maybe this hefty lawsuit can make a difference if won (may it be quite a victory for Laura here). I wonder if there’s ever been a dignitary in America who’s GOP or anything else that’s against the leftist morons who has ever “dared” to tell off the MSM “we don’t anser to you, we only anser to the people….and God”? I wonder if 2020 offers a chance to knock omar, tlaib, aoc, and other like/similar radicals of DC? God Help Us!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles

spot_img

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts